tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post114600996397684561..comments2023-07-08T08:11:18.914-04:00Comments on BOYCOTT ARUBA--JUSTICE FOR NATALEE: DAN ABRAMS--AM I GOING CRAZY?Michelle Says So 2.0http://www.blogger.com/profile/14471724126668056060noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post-1146079080619413332006-04-26T15:18:00.000-04:002006-04-26T15:18:00.000-04:00In Aruba law, the civil case can preempt the crimi...In Aruba law, the civil case can preempt the criminal case. One current example is PVDS vs Aruban <BR/>government civil lawsuit to be awarded by the Dutch judge Rik Smid. Rik Smid forced the Public <BR/>Prosecutor Karin Jassen to close her Joran criminal investagation in order to review the criminal <BR/>case files to determine the amount of money that the Aruban government should pay the Paul van <BR/>der Sloot family for damages caused by Joran's criminal behavior. If this New York civil case were moved to Aruba, it will be a double whammy to Karin Jassen to reopen the Joran Aruban <BR/>criminal case and close it again and forced the Aruban Government to pay double the money paying <BR/>to Paulus and Joran van der Sloot. Therefore Robin A. Schair's opinion expressed in Joe Tacopina's Exhibit Q is incorrect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post-1146048865652460702006-04-26T06:54:00.000-04:002006-04-26T06:54:00.000-04:00When comparing the latest court filings of John Ke...When comparing the latest court filings of John Kelly and Joe Tacopina, people can see that the presentations of John Kelly are of a much better and superior quality. John's rebuttals are clear, straightforward and precise. While Joe's arguments are verbose twined by too many crytic and off-focus case laws links which, of many of them were having been reversed or overturned by the courts. In brief, Joe T. has not comprehended the civil case filed against Joran & Paulus van der Sloot. Joe T. has created a chaos of his own unrevealing writings.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post-1146024284009761942006-04-26T00:04:00.000-04:002006-04-26T00:04:00.000-04:00Dompigs son should be arrested and charged with Ob...Dompigs son should be arrested and charged with Obstruction of Justice...Plain and simple..If these parents of GVC don't scream bloody murder and insist on his arrest[[THEN WHY NOT!!]] OK..who's got more dirt on who AGAIN...You take my son down then I will take your son down...This damn island is sooo filthy with corruption a herd of turds wouldn't live there...Julia is beyond my vocabulary...no mere words can describe her....Just complete insanity...I remember Beth saying that their is so much going on down there its frightening...how true!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post-1146018438089901682006-04-25T22:27:00.000-04:002006-04-25T22:27:00.000-04:00http://www.bartleby.com/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/ah...http://www.bartleby.com/cgi-bin/texis/webinator/ahdsearch?<BR/>search_type=enty&query=domiciliary&db=ahd&Submit=Search is the link. <BR/>1) domicile. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. <BR/>...Middle English domicilie, from Old French domicile, from Latin domicilium, from domus, house. <BR/>See dem- in Appendix I.domi·cili·ary (-sil-er) -ADJECTIVE...<BR/> <BR/>Something is wrong with Joe Tacopina's sentence of the following: "Plaintiff Elizabeth Ann Twitty is not a domiciliary or resident of New York." The term "domiciliary" is an adjective. The correct grammar should construct the said sentence as "Plaintiff Elizabeth Ann Twitty is not a domicile or resident of New York." Or in plain American English, "Plaintiff Elizabeth Ann <BR/>Twitty is not a house or resident of New York." We all know that Beth is the mother of Natalee, <BR/>and Beth is not a house. Therefore this sentence has the wrong meaning, and its wrong meaning <BR/>makes the whole sentence invalid, and hence it makes the whole document of Joe Tacopina's filing invalid.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19199597.post-1146015972401394792006-04-25T21:46:00.000-04:002006-04-25T21:46:00.000-04:00great job Michelle! You know them all well. Can t...great job Michelle! You know them all well. Can this get any more bizarre? I would kick Julia Renfoe's butt, if I could get ahold of her. grrrrAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com