October 14, 2007

CRIMES AGAINST NATALEE--PART I



The disappearance of Natalee Holloway on the island of Aruba May 29, 2005 has raised far more questions than have been answered.


In this next series of documents, we will show what are most likely the actual events that transpired on Monday, May 30th 2005, based on subsequent statements given by the suspects and witnesses involved.


In studying all information available to the public at this point, we believe we have determined a very plausible chain of events engaged in by the four main suspects in this case - Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, and Joran and Paulus van der Sloot - on the day following Miss Holloway's disappearance.


With this much deliberate conflict in the statements, what was really happening the morning and afternoon of May 30th, 2005?



Was Paulus' confusion about Joran's school attendance, and his own lack of detail about the day an attempt to cover up a meeting of all four with police officials at the Bubali police station? Was the inconsistency in the time Satish was supposed to go to school that morning due to the same reason? Was all of this misdirection put into place to then also cover their meeting at the van der Sloot home around the pool for the purpose of creating/finalizing the Holiday Inn alibi, in an attempt to tell the same story by the time Natalee was reported missing?



Anita van der Sloot lets it slip that Joran spoke with police on Monday, May 30 2005



ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He hasn't told me anything, because, on the Monday, he went to school, like any normal boy. And he wasn't aware of—he was totally surprised when the police asked him to come to the—or picked him up for interrogation. He was totally surprised. He really thought that the girl would be safe in the hotel and there was no reason to talk about her at all.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551822



Deepak gives a clear indication of
having spoken with police on May 30th


He then asked me whether I wanted to go with to "Carlos & Charlies", because he had met a few girls and wanted to meet them again in "Carlos & Charlies". I agreed and told him that I would pick him up later. A little before 23.00 hours I drove home. I ate something at home together with my brother Satish and after that I vacuumed the carpet on the inside of my car.

DEEPAK 6/9


To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. About that I can state the following, I had vacuumed my car the previous day.


DEEPAK 6/10


Satish makes reference to a choller he had spoken about in his first police statement. No such reference is included in Satish's 5/31 statement, thus telling us he spoke with police on May 30th.

Joran: (to Deepak) Then you're going to tell shit about the choller. I have helped you with that that shit of the choller friend.

Deepak: And, I also said that.

Joran: That I have not read. I have also read that statement.

Satish: That of the chollers was from me. I have already told that before. I have also said that in my first statement.

police van 6/29


Mickey John's information tells us the suspects made up the Holiday Inn story on May 30th


VAN SUSTEREN: How certain are you that that your memory is correct that the family or the father was involved in creating this cover-up story?

JOHN: Well, he told me — he, all of them, sit and make up the story. He, Dutch guy, and the family. He told me they made up a story that they said they dropped the girl off at the Holiday Inn. She was talking to a black guy, security guard specific, dressed in black pants, black top.

VAN SUSTEREN: So what percentage certain are you that he said family or father that was involved in this?

JOHN: He said family.

VAN SUSTEREN: So you're certain?

JOHN: I'm certain.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html



Was Joran at school on May 30th or not?


JORAN SAID HE WENT TO SCHOOL ON THE 30TH


At approximately 06.30, I woke up. Between 03.45 am and 06.30 am I talked to no-one on my mobile phone. At approximately 06.45 am I got on the bus. Between 06.30 am and 06.45 am I did not talk to anyone on my mobile phone. At approximately 08.00 am, I arrived at school on the bus. I had slept the entire time the bus took to get to school. During the ride to school I don't think I called anyone with my mobile phone. I do think that I had received a message from "Flor". I did not loan my phone out to anyone to make a phone call. I am sure of that. My school starts at 08.00 am and ends at 14.45 pm.

JVDS 6-14


6:30 E-mail or Text message to Steve Croes by Joran or Deepak 6:30 am Records show call from one of the 3 boys cellphones in Santa Lucia area in Aruba. (confirmed by Aruba Today) Monday morning to another cell located in the cell site of Santa Lucia. This is north of Santa Cruz and that cellsite covers the middle northern part of the island. (this is also listed in the newsarticles that Julie Renfro reported as confirmed)
Aruba Today


PAULUS SAID JORAN GOT ON THE BUS ON THE 30TH WITH HIS BROTHERS LIKE HE ALWAYS DOES, BUT HE IS NOT ABSOLUTELY SURE OF IT BECAUSE HE DIDN'T NOTICE IT



On May 30th in the hours of the morning, I did not notice anything different/out of the ordinary with Joran. According to me he got onto the bus of the I.S.A. with his brothers Sebastian and Valentijn just like he alway s does. I am not absolutely sure about that because I didn't notice it and because Joran didn't have to be at school every day during that period. He was busy with his final exams and sometimes he stayed home.

PVDS 6-18



PAULUS DOESN'T REMEMBER IF JORAN WENT TO SCHOOL ON THE 30TH


To your question whether Joran went to school on Monday May 30th 2005, I can state the following. I cannot precisely recollect whether Joran went to school that day. It is possible that he did not go to school that day.
PVDS 6-23



PAULUS DOESN'T THINK JORAN WENT TO SCHOOL ON THE 30TH


But I do not remember exactly which days he did not go with the bus. It could be that it was that Monday. Most likely I informed the bus driver that Joran would not be going with the bus. A clue to the fact that Joran did not go to school that Monday could be that on Tuesday I insisted that he went to school that day.


PVDS 6-23

The mother of the girl by that time had already left. At least I did not see her anymore. We were dropped off home by the officers. It was starting to get light.

I woke up Valentijn and Sebastian and I also said to Joran that he had to go to school even though he wasn't in the mood to go. I know that I insisted that he should go. A reason for that might be that he had already not gone to school on Monday. I then left for work.


PVDS 6/23


When did the Kalpoe brothers really wake up, and why did Satish lie to his mother about what time school started that day?


DEEPAK SAID HE DID NOT WAKE UP UNTIL 1:30 or 2:00 PM,
SATISH SAYS HE WOKE UP AT 1:00 PM


I had spoken to no-one until I woke up at approximately 14.00

DEEPAK 6-09


On that Monday in question, I woke up around 13.30 hours. When I got out of my room, I saw that Satish had also come out of his room.

DEEPAK 6-13


1:00 PM My brother woke up around 1 p.m. I asked him how Joran did get home during the night

SATISH 6-13


SATISH DOES NOT GO TO SCHOOL ON THE 30TH


My school would start at 10.30 on Monday May 30th 2005.

Did you go to school on Monday May 30th 2005?

No, I did not go to school on Monday May 30th 2005.


SATISH 6-10 second statement

In the morning, at 6.30 a.m. my mother woke me up so I had to go to school. I told her I would not have classes that early and that my classes would start at 11.00 a.m.

SATISH 6-13

I woke up at 11.00 hours on Monday May 30th 2005.

SATISH 6-10 second statement

On May 30th 2005 I had awoken between 11.00 hours and 12.00 hours When I woke up I asked my brother if he knew how Joran had made it to his house

SATISH 6-11

My mother was then going to wake me up at 10.30 a.m. She though overslept and did not wake me up. I woke up around 12.00 noon

SATISH 6-13


Did Paulus go to work that day or not? What was the reason for claiming a poor memory about his activities that day?


PAULUS SAID HE WENT TO WORK AT APPROXIMATELY 8:00, BUT DOES NOT KNOW THE PRECISE TIME FOR SURE, AND DOESN'T REMEMBER IF HE CAME HOME DURING THE MIDDLE OF THE DAY TO EAT


On May 30th at approximately 08.00, I went to work. The precise time I do not know for sure because during that period I had different hours on different days that I started working. I cannot remember any more if I came home to eat in the middle of the day because that too was different on different days.

PVDS 6-18



PAULUS SAID HE WENT TO WORK,
DOES NOT REMEMBER THE EXACT
TIME BUT THINKS IT WAS APPROXIMATELY 8:00


To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work. The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately 08.00 hours.

PVDS 6-23


Were the 10:00 trip to the CMB Bank, lying to the Kalpoe brother's mom, and Joran's questionable attendance at school all attempts to cover a trip to the Bubali police station by the four suspects on Monday, May 30th which was followed by the meeting around the pool at the van der Sloot home?












PAULUS SAID HE WENT TO THE CMB BANK AROUND 10:00 AND LEFT WITHOUT MAKING A TRANSACTION


I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without having made any transaction and went back to work.

PVDS 6-23


We believe the meeting all four suspects had at the Bubali police station took place around 10:00 am on Monday, May 30th.

We also believe the meeting around the van der Sloot pool took place at approximately 11:00 am that morning.


PAULUS SAID HE LEFT WORK AND WENT TO THE BANK AGAIN AT 3:00


I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.
PVDS 6-23


PAULUS SAID HE GOT HOME FROM WORK AT 4:30 AND THE KIDS WERE HOME

At approximately 16.30, I got home and the kids were already home. Because my wife was in the Netherlands I wanted to be home when the kids came home from school.

PVDS 6-18


Paulus stated that long lines prevented him from making a deposit to the C.M. Bank during his 10:00 am visit to the bank. Paulus states he left work and arrived again at the bank at 3:30 PM, yet he claims that he didn’t get home until 4:30 PM that same day.


What type of banking transaction takes 40 - 50 minutes to complete?

Did Paulus go somewhere else after
that visit to the bank, and before he went home?



PAULUS SAID HE LEFT WORK AT 3:00, GOES TO THE BANK AND GETS HOME FROM THE BANK AT 4:15. JORAN AND RITA, THE MAID ARE THERE, HE DOESN'T REMEMBER IF THE OTHER TWO KIDS ARE THERE

To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank. At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately 500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he had taken over my place in the tournament. After depositing the money I went home. I cannot exactly remember what time it was when I got home. I think it was 16.15 hours. According to me both Rita and Joran where at home. Whether Valentijn and Sebastian where also there that Monday I cannot remember anymore because Valentijn and Sebastian quite often went over to a friends house during that time-period. Whether I went with Joran to eat at a fast food restaurant that afternoon I cannot remember. I can only remember that while Anita was away I went and ate with him once. I don't think it is likely that we did that day because I left work at approximately 15.00 hours.

PVDS 6-23


JORAN SAID HE GOT HOME FROM SCHOOL ABOUT 4:00


Approximately 14.45 pm, I got back onto the school bus to be driven home. I arrived at home at approximately 16.00 pm. It is possible that I called someone or that someone called me. It is also possible that I sent or received messages. I am sure Satish didn't and Deepak it is possible. If I had talked to Deepak then I would have asked him what he had been doing that day or what he was going to do.

JORAN 6-14


DEEPAK GOES TO WORK AT 3:30/3:45


At about 15.30 hours, my brother drove me to work with my car because I do not want to park my car in the parking lot/parking space. After that I started working.

DEEPAK 6-13

Around 3.45 p.m. I brought my brother to his work at Sea Port Market Place. During the rest of the day I did not hear from Joran

SATISH 6-13



Unbeknownst to the Kalpoe brothers, we believe Joran and Paulus had developed a plan for disposal of Miss Holloway's remains by this point in the day, and were making preparations.



Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

Natalee's Freebirds

http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/

JUSTICE WAS NEVER A CONSIDERATION



**This is the latest from Natalee's Freebirds...more to come! Thanks Freebirds!


Beth Holloway Twitty - 'Scarborough Country' - 10/21/05


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: They never—they never wanted to implicate these three young men.

They never wanted to implicate them from the beginning. And there is a list of reasons, you know, why we know that is true.


THE MISSING PERSON’S REPORT - THE CATALYST TO A COVERUP


1. THE PAULUS VAN DER SLOOT CONNECTION

The chaperone, Paul Lilly, reported Natalee Holloway's disappearance to the Beach Patrol/Visibility Team on the morning of Monday, May 30, 2005. The chain of command implies that a copy of the Missing Person's Report was passed on to either the Bubali or Noord police station which are located equal distances from the offices of the the Beach Patrol/Visibility team.

It could be assumed that Paul Lilly included in his report a description of Joran as well as a description of Deepak's vehicle as conveyed by the MB students. This information contained within the Missing Person's Report had the ability to give way to speculation by either Jan van der Straaten or Dennis Jacobs and this speculation may have led to Paulus van der Sloot, a close friend and colleague, being contacted/forewarned.

Jan Van Der Straaten - NANCY GRACE - 06/02/05

GRACE: Commissioner Jan Van Der Straten is with us from Aruba. Commissioner, when exactly was she reported missing?

VAN DER STRATEN: She was reported missing on Monday morning



Beth Twitty - NANCY GRACE - 10/03/05

B. TWITTY: Yes, there was a DEA on island, Eric Williams (ph) -- that`s another story, Nancy. But, anyway, they met us there at the Holiday Inn lobby because Paul Lilly (ph) had had such a horrific time on that Monday, the 30th, just trying to get help. He had been speaking with the beach patrol, visibility team, no one seemed to know -- talk about the right hand and left hand -- no one knew how to guide him or help him begin.


Paulus van der Sloot - NOVA/TWAN HUYS - 06/28/05

Paulus van der Sloot: That gives a feeling of absurdity. It is indeed almost unimaginable that by someone you actually know very well, where you worked together with for a long time, that that one comes to tell you that you are suspected of complicity to murder.

HUYS: Who was that in your case?

VAN DER SLOOT: That was, in this case, that was the leader of the team of police commissioners.

HUYS: Jan van der Straaten.

VAN DER SLOOT: That was Jan van der Straaten, yes.

HUYS: And you know each other very well?

VAN DER SLOOT: Yes.



Eric Zaandam - President Police Union, Aruban television 8/28/06

Now, information are coming out that Jan v/d Straatten was indeed investigated and had telephone conversations with people about the case that he should not have contacts with, or even talk about the case.


Rudy Croes - Minister of Justice - Top 95 radio 8/28/06

Aruban Minister of Justice Mr. Rudy Croes, in relationship with the Natalee Holloway investigation, revealed a very serious information in direction of Van der Straaten.

Minister Croes revealed that he knows about various telephone calls of Van der Straaten and that he, the minister, knows with whom Van der Straaten was talking to…...


2. MAY 30, 2005 "OFF THE RECORD" INTERROGATIONS?

Joran van der Sloot: On July 12, 2005 Anita Van der Sloot stated in a Joe Scarborough interview that Joran was picked up from school by police on Monday, May 30, 2005. Joran has never implied in interviews or declarations that he was ever picked up by police for questioning.


Anita Van der Sloot - 'Scarborough Country' - 07/12/05

ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He hasn't told me anything, because, on the Monday, he went to school, like any normal boy. And he wasn't aware of—he was totally surprised when the police asked him to come to the—or picked him up for interrogation. He was totally surprised. He really thought that the girl would be safe in the hotel and there was no reason to talk about her at all.”


Deepak Kalpoe: In his official statement of June 10, 2005 Deepak Kalpoe claims that he vacuumed his vehicle prior to picking up Joran Van der Sloot on Sunday May 29, 2005. He also states that he remembers telling interrogators at Bubali that his vehicle was very clean because he had vacuumed his car the prior evening. This would imply Deepak was questioned by police at Bubali station on May 30, 2005.


Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/09/05

He then asked me whether I wanted to go with to "Carlos & Charlies", because he had met a few girls and wanted to meet them again in "Carlos & Charlies". I agreed and told him that I would pick him up later. A little before 23.00 hours I drove home. I ate something at home together with my brother Satish and after that I vacuumed the carpet on the inside of my car. After I finished vacuuming I went and took a shower. A little before 0.00 hours I drove to Joran's house. Joran lives on the address Montanja 19.

Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/10/05

To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. You are telling to me that my car looked very clean on that day. About that I can state the following, I had vacuumed my car the previous day.


Satish Kalpoe: On June 29, 2005 in a secretly recorded conversation in a police van, Satish Kalpoe conveys to Joran that he told police about the choller in his first police statement. Satish's witness statement of May 31, 2005 has been revealed and there is no mention of the choller. It can be assumed that the first statement Satish is referring to must have been taken on May 30, 2005.

Satish Kalpoe - Leaked Police Vehicle Recording - 06/29/05

Joran: (to Deepak) Then you're going to tell shit about the choller. I have helped you with that that shit of the choller friend.

Deepak: And, I also said that.

Joran: That I have not read. I have also read that statement.

Satish: That of the chollers was from me. I have already told that before. I have also said that in my first statement
.


3. THE BUBALI/NOORD POLICE STATIONS?

On May 31, 2005 Joran, Deepak and Satish were officially interrogated as witnesses by Dennis Jacobs at the Bubali Police Station. On June 1, 2005 Beth gave a statement at the Bubali Police Station. However, Dave Holloway was directed to the Noord police station upon his arrival on the Island that same day.

Why was Dennis Jacobs who interrogated Joran, Deepak and Satish at Bubali on May 31, as well as Beth at Bubali on June 1, 2005 now officiating at the Noord Police Station later in the day of June 1, 2005?


Beth Holloway - LOVING NATALEE - 06/01/05

Page 76

It's cold inside the Bubali police station Wednesday morning.

Jug, Jodi, and I wait, again, to give our statements. The time is ticking away. An hour passes. Then another one. ... And finally detective Jacobs comes out to the waiting area to get me.

Detective Jacobs says he will only take my statement, not the others.



Dave Holloway - Aruba: Corruption in Paradise - 06/02/05

When I arrived in Aruba with my family, we hit the island running. We rented a car and immediately headed out to find a police station. There were only four on the island and I was amazed to find that first two we entered knew nothing about Natalee's disappearance. We were then directed to a third one, the Noord Police Station. I walked in and said, "I'm Dave Holloway and I need to talk to you about my daughter who is missing." A man in the back stood up and said, "How much money do you have?". That was how I first met Detective Dennis Jacobs, the investigator who was assigned to handle Natalee's case after Beth made a report to him upon her arrival on the island.


CONCLUSION

Was the reasoning behind Beth and Jug Twitty giving their statements at the Bubali Police Station on June 1, 2005, while Dave Holloway was directed to the Noord station that same day to speak with Jacobs, because a plan to protect Joran and Paulus van der Sloot from implication was well under way - an agenda set into motion by the filing of a Missing Person's Report on the morning of May 30, 2005?

In pursuance of the agenda to protect Joran and Paulus van der Sloot from implication, could Paulus' friends and colleagues Dennis Jacobs and Jan van Straaten have assumed complete control of information gathering and manipulation pertaining to a missing American named Natalee Holloway almost immediately following the filing of the Missing Person's Report by the chaperone Paul Lilly?

Dave Holloway - ARUBA: Corruption in Paradise - 06/01/05

Pages 9/10

Jacobs painted a scenario that questioned all of the beliefs and values that we had instilled in Natalee. He insinuated that she had met someone and fallen in love. "This happens all the time. She will probably show up in a few days", he theorized. "She was just partying hard," he added. "Don't worry. Just go down to Carlos'n Charlie's and have a beer."

Jacobs also told us that the day before we arrived, he had interviewed the boys who eventually became the three main suspects in Natalee's disappearance ...... Jacobs considered the boys' statements to be consistent in that they had all said that they dropped Natalee off at the hotel. However, I did not realize at the time that Beth had already told him that the tapes did not show Natalee returning to the Holiday Inn that night.


Beth Holloway - LOVING NATALEE - 06/01/05

Page 78

The statement is printed out and I sign it. But I am not allowed a copy of it.

Jug comes back to the little office as I unwind my legs from my arms to get up from the chair, preparing to leave. Jacobs makes a febble attempt to comfort us by saying. "You know ... she'll show up. You should just go to Carlos 'n Charlie's and a crack addict will bring her back when she runs out of money."

Shocked, I reply. "Wait a minute. The two young men who were last seen with her told us they left her at the hotel. Remember? I just gave you all that information. ... Besides, I already told you she doesn't have a debit card with her, and I showed you all her cash. It was in her bag. Who-ever has her isn't keepinig her for the money."


Natalee and her family deserve justice,
and we will not let up until they have it!



October 04, 2007

BETH RETURNS TO ARUBA



She's Baaaack!!!


Yes, Greta finally did something right. Taking Beth back to the island that devoured her daughter, her family and her life.


As I watched the footage of Greta and Beth's trip to Aruba last night, I noticed the island seemed so much uglier than before (if that is possible). Dustier, dirtier, desolate. The beaches didn't even look pretty...everything seemed so bland and third-world. I've been to more beautiful and scenic places in the U.S. than what I saw on TV last night. It was so evident that the boycott has really affected the island, in more ways than one.


There are many comments on forums from Arubans or anti-Beth freaks that say Greta is promoting the boycott. First, there is no way that Greta would ever publicly support the boycott. As a journalist, she cannot give her own opinions...or at least she shouldn't, unless it is a "Commentary". Second, FOX would never allow her to promote the boycott because her opinions do not represent the opinions of FOX News Corp.


What I think she did without having to actually say, "BOYCOTT" is by showing the ugly side of Aruba, keeping Natalee's story and Aruba's corrupt little island in the front of our minds. There are many out there that don't follow the case as much as we do...keeping those people informed and reiterating what kind of place it is will be more detrimental than to say "Boycott". Greta mentioned she would never go back and the trip didn't go well. She never said to boycott, and in fact, Beth hasn't mentioned the word BOYCOTT either...not in a very long time.


It is a GRASSROOTS EFFORT. The PEOPLE are the ones holding Aruba's purse strings. Greta and Beth just reinforce through reporting and keeping the story alive. What they do does not promote a boycott; however the consequences of such is exactly what the grassroots boycott effort wants AND we are succeeding at it.



I think the pictures, the evidence of Aruba's seedy underbelly, the actions of those involved, and the facts that we actually know only help the boycott of that stinkhole. Greta and Beth just did a great job at doing it without having to SAY it.


Great job!

September 24, 2007

BETH TO BE ON LARRY KING LIVE OCTOBER 3

A SERIOUS MESSAGE REGARDING FUTURE COMMENTS

Here is a recent comment that I posted today:


The Dutch oil company gave lots of money to the NY based private college, so the Iranian President was invited to visit the campus and the Dutch Aruban students there. They are the main organisers for the unAmerican event.

Mon Sep 24, 01:29:00 PM EDT


My reply:



Michelle Says So said...


PROOF please. What NY private college? So the Iranian President was invited to visit the campus and the Dutch Aruban students there. If so, when? Dates? What was said? Give some proof.


Or is this just more insidious crap?


I apologize in advance if this was a serious post, but with all the weirdos that post here (some of which I have to censor out of respect for Natalee and Beth), I have to not only allow most posts for my belief in freedom of speech; however, I have to draw the line when the word slut, "she deserved it", etc. is used. These are just outright lies.


And to me as a recovering assault victim, I find it intolerable.


If you have been reading this blog for the last 2 years, you must understand that most of the time I don't know what is BS and what isn't...and if someone uses "anonymous" all the time I don't and will no longer trust the credibility of that post unless someone has the balls to at least even use a NAME...fictional or otherwise.


Afraid of "multiple monikers" who might use your name to fake comments? We all know there are ways to find out where a person lives (even with a proxy). If you feel you've been wronged, write me ASAP. I'm able to find out who they are, where they are from and their possible "agenda".


So "multiple monikers" out there, you are not fool proof.


I have too many people on the side of this blog to let any stone un-turned, including A LOT of tech savvy people...including those who know a lot more about this case with all their investigation work and research (i.e. Natalee's Freebirds) and the the knowledge of the "secret" identities of the evil spawns of satan from forums who dedicate thier lives to trashing the family.


This blog has many protectors and these individuals are my base...they care just as much as I do about this case and whom I own great gratitude. Some of these individuals have more time to help me with this blog due to my time constraints being a "regular jane" with a full time job and a child to raise on my own. Those people involved fill me in. I can and have gotten the facts and evidence I need to know to blow a lot of people out of the water.


Trying to 'debunk" or discredit this blog won't happen. I'm too much of a warrior to allow it, so don't even try.


Remember, I am the black mamba. Look it up if you don't know about this infamous and deadly snake.


I believe in complete and total justice...with out without the police or "proper" authorities involved; because unfortunately justice is not served as much as it should (especially those victims that are women.)


When someone is victimized they don't need a "jury of their peers" to judge and pass blame. They don't need to be rudely questioned by some defense attorney who only cares about his acquittal rate.


Those victims WERE THERE...they know what happened. They suffer everyday with the aftermath of the victimization.


I honestly believe is it time for women to take matters into their own hands, no matter the consequences. We cannot allow ourselves to be victims due to men who force their so-called "power" on us.


Take a look at "Justice is a Woman with a Sword", by D.A. Clarke @


In the future, if anyone wants to comment and write some possibly outlandish and false statements I am going to REQUIRE back up proof.


This blog WILL NOT be used because just because I allow most comments. Don't get me wrong...I draw the line on MANY people...just out of principle and respect for the person I have been avenging for the last 2.5 years...including her mother.


Enough is enough.


September 20, 2007

THE RED LIGHT IS FADING...WILL IT EVER GO AWAY?



The Land of Johns, Whores, Whores, and More Whores...



AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - About a third of Amsterdam's red-lit windows for prostitutes will disappear from the city center as one of the main brothel owners is set to sell his empire (I think calling something that an "empire" is just appalling and disgusting beyond belief...more like a really wealthy PIMP!) to a real estate company.


A housing company is to buy 18 premises, currently featuring 51 windows, for about 25 million euros ($35 million), Amsterdam city council said.


Last November, the city revoked the trading licenses of 33 brothels because they were suspected of criminal activities including money laundering and drug dealing. However, the brothel owners appealed successfully against the decision.


Tourist authorities acknowledge the 700-year-old red-light district -- a maze of narrow alleys and canals lined with sex shops, prostitutes behind windows and marijuana-selling "coffee shops" -- is as much of a draw as other attractions such as the Van Gogh museum or the Anne Frank House. Mayor Job Cohen said he had no plans to rid Amsterdam of prostitution but the concentration of sex in the city center was too high.


SOMETHING WE ALREADY KNOW... ARUBA IS UNACCEPTABLE!



The Netherlands: 'Governmental
power of Aruba unsatisfactory'



ORANJESTAD
– The Netherlands wants a dialogue with Aruba about the differences in opinion on the desired autonomy and the governmental power of the island.


The Netherlands has noticed that 'regularly there are indications of governmental incidents' and the governmental power qualifies as unsatisfactory. Same arrangements on good governance must therefore be made with Aruba as with the Antillean islands on their way to a new political structure. This is stated in Chapter IV Kingdom Relations of the Dutch 2008 budget presented to the Dutch Parliament today. Aruban ministers have often declared themselves openly in favour of independence.


Justice-minister Rudy Croes (MEP) said that he is ashamed of his Dutch passport and that he prefers an Aruban one. Also Prime Minister Nelson Oduber had the word independence in his mouth recently, when the Plant NV deal failed. He even forbid his civil servants to take part in the negotiations regarding the new political structure of the Antilles.


In the meantime, the Aruban government seems to be seeking rapprochement again. The governor said last week during the opening of the new parliamentary session that the government strives for strengthening the ties with the partners within the Kingdom.


The Netherlands now wants a dialogue with Aruba to improve the island's government and tie this into conversations on political adjustment and conversations on the cooperation program that comes to an end in 2009.


However, Aruba would like the Netherlands to continue participating in the Fondo Desaroyo Aruba (FDA). But up till now, the Netherlands has been varying her expressions on this. There is a political deliberation on the continuation of the development relation in the fall of 2007.

The maintenance of law and order program is
part of this and will be included in the discussion.



Important point of interest is the immigration policy, according to the Netherlands. The support from the Netherlands for the public finances will continue. The dept-quote is anticipated to increase with one percent this year to 47.5 percent of the gross domestic product (BBP). The real growth in relation to the BBP is estimated on 1.5 to 2 percent. The Netherlands bases herself on the figures of the Central Bank of Aruba.


"As part of promoting the autonomy of the Kingdom partners, it is of great importance that the countries are not too dependent of third parties financially. This is expressed in a reduction of the debt-quote of both countries." The Netherlands is also of the opinion that thanks to a favourable economic development (Hello? Someone is in serious denial about that...unless they are talking about the money laundering, drug and sex trafficking...), the Aruban government can have the budget deficit under control with some specific measures.


As part of the political renewals, the Solidarity fund between the islands of the Neth.Antilles and Aruba will be canceled out. This is a financial benefit of 4 million euro for Aruba that can be put in the FDA.

September 17, 2007

CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST NATALEE



May 30th, 2005 - The Cover Up Had Begun


The activities that were taking place on the Island of Aruba on May 30, 2005 involving Paulus, Joran, Deepak and Satish indicate that the cover up regarding crimes committed against Natalee Holloway were already in the implementation stages.



1. There are those who theorize that Joran van der Sloot was never at the beach with Natalee Holloway. Satish Kalpoe's attorney, Dave Kock, confirms that on the morning of May 30, 2005 cell phone records place Joran van der Sloot near the Marriot Hotel. Also, the gardener places Deepak and Joran across the street from the Marriot beach at 2:30 AM on the morning of May 30, 2005.


Dave Kock - On the Record w/ Greta - 08/26/05


GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: All right. So your client, 2 o'clock to 3 o'clock, is on the Internet at home. I've been in his room. I've seen the computer, or at least where it was. And he gets phone calls at 2:40 and 3 a.m. from Joran. Where do the cell records place the phone that Joran is using at 2:40 and 3 o'clock in the morning?

DAVID KOCK, SATISH KALPOE'S ATTORNEY:: Well, there's not an exact pinpoint indication, but the general area is the area here in north in Palm Beach of the hotel.

VAN SUSTEREN: So it looks like he's not home at that hour, but someplace near the Marriott, is that right?

KOCK: That is correct. He is in this neighborhood.



Carlos Ramos (Gardener) - Court Testimony - 08/15/05

On questions of the judge-commissar, the witness explains as follows:

RAMOS: I do not know Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe.


1. Can you remind yourself the declaration, which you have taken off 22 July 2005 on around 19.25 compared with the police force?


RAMOS: Yes


2. Have you then spoken the truth?


RAMOS: I have explained what I have seen.


3. The witness is asked to make a situation drawing (make production 1). The witness gives to where the car of suspect stood and the route he took.


4. Did you see the face of the driver when you went past?


RAMOS: Yes.


5. Did you recognize him with a photograph confrontation?


RAMOS: Yes, on the day that I gave a declaration at the police force they left me a photograph see from an illustrated magazine. That is the only photograph that they showed me.


6. Did you recognize the faces of the other persons in the car?


RAMOS: Yes, the face of the person who sat beside the driver. When I came past I saw, in the light of my car, that the person beside the driver had his head and face covered with his hands. I have recognized that person from his illustration (photo). You ask me how I recognized the driver who sat beside the man who screened its face? I have seen him in the light of my "in the light of" (van). He moved himself a bit to the back.


7. You have also recognized Deepak Kalpoe?


RAMOS: yes, on the same photograph which the police force showed me.



Beth Twitty - CNN LARRY KING LIVE - 02/23/06


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ... Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon, he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI. She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.



2. On the morning of May 30, 2005 was Paulus Van der Sloot summoned to the Marriot Beach area after Natalee Holloway died in the course of wrongdoings which involved his son? Did Paulus van der Sloot, with the assistance of others, move Natalee's body on the morning of May 30, 2005 to an undisclosed location? Was some thus far unknown “white vehicle” involved?


Jossy Mansur - NANCY GRACE - 07/29/05


MANSUR: there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.


David Mattingly: Cnn Correspondent - PAULA ZAHN NOW - 07/05/05


MATTINGLY: Defense attorneys for the Kalpoe brothers tonight confirmed to CNN that testimony from fishermen telling investigators that they didn't see a couple matching the description of Natalee Holloway and Joran van der Sloot on that beach the night that Natalee turned up missing. What they are saying is that they saw a white Suzuki on that beach …


Karl Penhaul: CNN Correspondent - NANCY GRACE - 07/14/05


PENHAUL: What the fishermen do, interestingly, say, though, is that sometime in the timeframe when they were there, they`re assuming sometime around 3:00 AM, that they saw a Jeep-type vehicle pull up near the beach. That was the only vehicle that they saw close to the beach, a Jeep-type vehicle.


T.J. Ward: Private Investigation - 'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' - 11/14/05


WARD: We think he has played a role in the cover up of her disappearance.

COSBY: How strong do you also still believe that the three boys played a role too from everything that you are getting?

WARD: We believe the boys are directly involved. And again, our theory is that something happened to Natalee, either where she stopped breathing, had a heart attack or whatever. And in the course of that happening, we think Paul Van der Sloot played a part in the after effect of that in the removal and concealing of Natalee Holloway.


Art Wood: Private Investigation - Sun Herald - 03/17/07


Wood told the more than 50 people who attended the Merrill Lynch-sponsored presentation about his experience in Aruba, where he believed three young men -- Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and Satish Kalpoe -- attempted to rape Holloway. In the process, he believed they accidentally killed her, then sought the advice of van der Sloot's prominent father to dispose of the body in the open ocean. Wood believed van der Sloot's father also used his connections to control the investigation. The case remains unsolved.


Gerold Dompig - 48 HOURS MYSTERY - 03/22/06


Dompig says he believes Paulus Van der Sloot does know more than he has been telling about the circumstances surrounding Holloway's disappearance.


Gerold Dompig - 48 HOURS MYSTERY - 03/22/06


The Aruban authorities’ new theory is that someone, someone possibly very close to the young suspects, took the time to carefully hide the body, not once but maybe twice, literally re-burying her.


Riehl World View - Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 04:53 AM


On Natalee's Yahoo forum there is a report that a helicopter is searching Santa Lucia area because according to the cell phone records of one of the three suspects there was a call in the Santa Lucia area at 6:30 am the morning Natalee was to have met up with the group to leave for airport.


3. Jossy Mansur conveys to Greta that the caretaker of the Fishermen's Huts located on the Marriott Beach reported that there was a break in on the morning that Natalee Holloway went missing. The items stolen were very significant when the disposal of a body is considered. Tim Miller claims that Gerold Dompig told him he believes that Natalee Holloway could have been put in the stolen fish trap and taken out to sea.


Jossy Mansur - On the Record w/ Greta - October 21, 2005


VAN SUSTEREN: Now, how big is this cage?

MANSUR: It is a big cage, it is a fish trap made with chicken coop wire. You know the ones that have the round holes in them? That’s pretty big.

VAN SUSTEREN: Could you put a body in it? Could you put someone 5’4” or 5’6” in it?

MANSUR: Jossy: Yes, you can.

VAN SUSTEREN: Was this reported…she disappeared on the 30th. When was this first reported missing?

MANSUR: It was reported to the police that same morning by the caretaker. The man who looks after the fishermen’s huts.

VAN SUSTEREN: So, it wasn’t because he had heard there was a missing person? It was just coincidentally I have a missing cage and reported it?

MANSUR: That is correct. He just told them there were a knife missing and a big fish trap missing.


Tim Miller/Gerold Dompig - KPRC Local 2 - 01/11/06


On Friday, EquuSearch founder Tim Miller and a deepwater search team from Florida will travel back to Aruba to search an area three to five miles off the island's coast that is between 800 to 1,000 feet deep, Miller told KPRC Local 2 that Aruba’s police commissioner told him that he feels Holloway might be inside a fish trap dropped deep into the water.



4. In Deepak Kalpoe's suspect statement of June 29, 2005 he concedes that he was creating internet chatter with a friend, John Charles Croes, on the morning of May 30, 2005 to obstruct the investigation into the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. How did Deepak know that there was going to be an investigation? Natalee Holloway had yet to be reported missing.



Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/11/05


To your question as to how late we got home, I can say the following. We arrived home approximately 02.20 hours.

When we got home Satish immediately went to bed. I had switched on the television. I had also turned on the computer in my room. I went and chatted with a friend of mine on “MSN”. His name is John Charles Croes. I had told the afore mentioned CROES during the chat that we had gone out and that I was waiting for a friend of mine because I had dropped him off on the street together with a girl.

After having chatted with John I went into the living room and watched TV.


Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/29/05


You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation.

The purpose of the chat traffic was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday.



5. After claiming in his witness statement of June 18, 2005 that he had slept "solidly" through the night of May 30, 2005, Paulus van der Sloot concedes that he may have used his phone.


Paulus van der Sloot - Witness Statement - 06/18/05


On May 30th 2005, in the nightly hours, I did not pick up Joran from anywhere. I slept solidly through the night without waking up. On May 30th in the hours of the morning, I did not notice anything different/out of the ordinary with Joran.


Greta Van Susteren - On the Record /w Greta - 07/03/05


VAN SUSTEREN: I am most anxious to find out if there was e-mail traffic or phone traffic among the three in custody in the early morning hours of May 30. I am also curious whether Paul van der Sloot used his phone between midnight and 7 a.m. on May 30. He told me no... he told the Dutch TV correspondent on camera no... but after the interview with the Dutch TV correspondent, he pulled him aside and said maybe he did make a call and that he was not sure. Honest mistake or does he fear to be in conflict with phone records now in custody of the police? These questions answered would be, in my mind, a huge jump forward in trying to sort out what did or did not happen.



6. In Rita Cosby and Nancy Grace interviews Beth Twitty claims that Paulus van der Sloot stated on the morning of May 31, 2005 that he had picked up Joran/them (?) at McDonalds at 4:00 AM on the morning of May 30, 2005. Paulus adamantly refutes Beth's words. However, Karin Janssen's official position within the investigation would indicate that she was deriving from a foundational knowledge when she stated that investigators suspected Paulus of being involved in Natalee's disappearance. Then in January 2007, the Superior Court ruled against compensation for Paulus van der Sloot in a wrongful detention lawsuit. The ruling stated that Paulus' detention was justified as his own declaration stated that he had picked up Joran and Natalee at McDonalds on the morning of May 30, 2005.



Beth Twitty - 'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' - 03/21/06


TWITTY: ... He had initially told the witnesses that he himself had picked up Joran Van Der Sloot at 4:00 a.m. on the night of the 30th. But he later changed it about three weeks into the investigation that he did not pick up Joran at 4:00 a.m. on the 30th.


Beth Twitty - NANCY GRACE - 08/12/05


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: And the night that we arrived on the island -- you know, Jug does not misinterpret a 4:00 AM time pickup to 11:00 PM. I mean, Paulus Van Der Sloot stated that he picked them up at 4:00 AM on May the 30th. Then -- we don`t know who they were, but then even as far as June 16 and June 17, Mr. Van Der Sloot was still stating this 4:00 AM pickup. Only until around -- maybe it was when he was picked up or arrested did he change it to 11:00 PM that I had knowledge of.



Karin Janssen - USA TODAY - 06/30/05


“They spoke about the situation that when there is no body you don’t have a case, and that was already in the first day after the disappearance,” Janssen said. Janssen said that the elder van der Sloot had obstructed the investigation by asking a friend of Joran, who had been interrogated by police, what he had told them. Janssen told MSNBC that he was arrested because investigators believed he was also a suspect in the disappearance.


Superior Court - January, 2007


" ... The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgment of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway."



7. Is there a Steve Croes and Geoffrey Van Comvoirt connection in regards to the assistance that Paulus Van der Sloot may have received if he was instrumental in moving the body Natalee Holloway from the Marriot Beach area on the morning of May 30, 2005? Steve Croes involved himself in the Natalee Holloway case by providing a false alibi for Joran, Deepak and Satish. Geoffrey Van Comvoirt's association with the Visibility Police/Beach Patrol would afford him access to a "white pickup". Also, Steve Croes and Geoffrey Van Comvoirt representation by the same attorney was sanctioned by Karin Janssen while she considered a similar situation a conflict of interest in regards to the security guards.



Beth Twitty - On the Record w/ Greta - 04/18/2006


TWITTY: .... And when I think of Joran van der Sloot and when I think of Steven Croes and I think of this new suspect (GVC) and the lies that were coming out early, very early, the moment we arrived on the island, if we find out that these three suspects are acquaintances or know each other — somebody needs to connect the dots. I mean, there certainly is a reason why Steven Croes came forward early on and stated, lied to the authorities that he had seen the two security guards taking Natalee. You know, people don't just do that for no reason, Greta. Somebody needs to connect the dots on those three, if they know each other.


Beth Twitty - NBC13 - 04/19/06


Natalee's mother, Beth Twitty, said she is hearing another story. " ... I'm hearing he (GVC) is also an acquaintance of Stephen Croes," Twitty said. Croes is a party boat disc jockey who was arrested early on in Natalee's case. He backed up van der Sloot's first story about dropping Natalee off at a Holiday Inn. "I have a feeling all of these suspects are tied together in some way," Twitty said.


John Kelly - On the Record w/ Greta - 04/19/05


KELLY: I know that's the situation. It's a woman, and that is the person who represented Croes and would be representing this individual now. And actually, Ms. Janssen, when I talked to her today, she was just getting ready to turn over the dossier to "G.V.C.'s" attorney for review before they did go into court.

VAN SUSTEREN: Then it's bizarre that this lawyer would represent both Steve Croes and GVC because at least here in the United States, I think most lawyers would say that there is a potential for conflict of interest and a lawyer shouldn't be representing both.

KELLY: I think that's right ......



Chris Lejez - ASSOCIATED PRESS - 06/11/05


Lejuez dropped John as a client per a request from the prosecutor, who said it's not ethical for him to represent both clients.


Chris Lejuez - NANCY GRACE - 06/07/05


LEJUEZ: I have been the defense attorney for both of them for the last two days. But as of tomorrow, I will be only for one of them, because apparently there will be a conflict of interest in defending them both. This has been told to me by the public prosecutor, so I will be resigning from one of the cases.



8. In Freddy's June 12, 2005 witness statement he reveals that Joran conveyed the Holiday Inn fabrication to him on the afternoon of May 30, 2005. This communication would imply that Joran was well aware that something had happened to Natalee Holloway, and this was hours before her family arrived to begin looking for her.


Freddy Zedan - Witness Statement - 06/12/05


Monday afternoon on the 30th, Joran came to my house. He told me that the previous day, Sunday, he had befriended a girl in the Holiday Inn casino and that she had invited him to come to Carlos and Charlies that evening.



After that they drove to the hotel. When the girl had pushed open the door of the car, she fell to the ground. Joran wanted to help her but she shoved him away. (....)

The next day, Tuesday May 31st 2005 in the afternoon, I was with Joran at the raquetclub.
Joran's Book - Translation Credit: Rammstein



9. One of the security guards, Mickey John, claims in the Greta interview of June 29, 2005 that while detained Deepak told him that Paulus was involved in the collaboration of the Holiday Inn fabrication. This would imply that the collaboration must have taken place on May 30, 2005.


Mickey John - On the Record /w Greta - 06/29/05


JOHN: He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.



10. Jan van der Straten concedes to Nancy Grace on June 2, 2005 that Natalee Holloway had been reported missing on the morning of May 30, 2005. It could be assumed that the report would have included descriptions of Joran, Deepak and Satish as well as Deepak's vehicle.


Jan Van Stratten - NANCY GRACE - 06/02/05


GRACE: Commissioner Jan Van Derstraten is with us from Aruba. Commissioner, when exactly was she reported missing?

VANDERSTRATEN: She was reported missing on Monday morning.



11. The implication of the prosecutor's words to Dan Abrams is that on May 30, 2005 Paulus van der Sloot was already giving Joran, Deepak and Satish legal advice.


Karin Janssen - ‘The Abrams Report’ - June 30, 2005


JANSSEN: The father has spoken with those three suspects, and he said he give them some legal advice, but I think the advices were going further than that. They spoke about the situation that when there is no body, you don‘t have a case. And that was already in the first day after the disappearance.



12. Prior to Jug and Beth Twitty's arrival on the Island of Aruba, certain happenings of May 30, 2005 would imply that someone within Aruban Law Enforcement was assisting Joran, Deepak and Satish in getting their stories straight regarding their encounter with Natalee Holloway.


JORAN VAN DER SLOOT


On July 12, 2005 Anita Van der Sloot stated in a Joe Scarborough interview that Joran was picked up from school by police on Monday, May 30, 2005. Joran has never implied in interviews or declarations that he was ever picked up by police for questioning.


Anita Van der Sloot - 'Scarborough Country' - 07/12/05


ANITA VAN DER SLOOT: He hasn't told me anything, because, on the Monday, he went to school, like any normal boy. And he wasn't aware of—he was totally surprised when the police asked him to come to the—or picked him up for interrogation. He was totally surprised. He really thought that the girl would be safe in the hotel and there was no reason to talk about her at all.”


DEEPAK KALPOE


Deepak Kalpoe claims in his official statement of June 10, 2005 that he vacuumed his vehicle prior to picking up Joran Van der Sloot on Sunday May 29, 2005. He also states that he remembers telling interrogators at Bubali on May 31, 2005 that his vehicle was very clean because he had vacuumed his car the prior evening. This would imply Deepak was questioned by police at Bubali station on May 30, 2005.



Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/09/05


He then asked me whether I wanted to go with to "Carlos & Charlies", because he had met a few girls and wanted to meet them again in "Carlos & Charlies". I agreed and told him that I would pick him up later. A little before 23.00 hours I drove home. I ate something at home together with my brother Satish and after that I vacuumed the carpet on the inside of my car. After I finished vacuuming I went and took a shower. A little before 0.00 hours I drove to Joran's house. Joran lives on the address Montanja 19.



Deepak Kalpoe - Suspect Statement - 06/10/05


To your question whether I can remember the day when I was summoned to the police station at Bubali, I can say the following. Yes I remember that day. You are telling to me that my car looked very clean on that day. About that I can state the following, I had vacuumed my car the previous day.


SATISH KALPOE


On June 29, 2005 in a secretly recorded conversation in a police van, Satish Kalpoe conveys to Joran that he told police about the choller in his first police statement. Satish's witness statement of May 31, 2005 has been revealed and there is no mention of the choller. It can be assumed that the first statement Satish is referring to must have been taken on May 30, 2005.


Satish Kalpoe - Leaked Police Vehicle Recording - 06/29/05


Joran: (to Deepak) Then you're going to tell shit about the choller. I have helped you with that that shit of the choller friend.

Deepak: And, I also said that.

Joran: That I have not read. I have also read that statement.

Satish: That of the chollers was from me. I have already told that before. I have also said that in my first statement.



13. Paul Reynolds implied that Paulus was implicated in Joran, Deepak and Satish's original statements. Considering that Deepak and Satish's May 31, 2005 witness statements do not implicate Paulus, it can be assumed that Natalee's uncle is referring to not yet revealed statements taken on May 30, 2005.



Paul Reynolds - 'Scarborough Country' - 08/26/05


REYNOLDS: Well, we certainly think they know more, but we think all three are involved. We think Joran and Deepak and Satish are all involved. And, you know, we still think the father was at least involved in the cover-up. And that‘s based on the statements that the boys gave in the beginning.



14. Joran claims in his suspect statement of June 14, 2005 that he played tennis on the evening of May 30, 2005. However, upon investigation, Art Wood discovered the contrary. Joran concedes in his book that he never did play tennis that day. Was the tennis game meant to be a cover regarding the real reason Joran was at the Racquet Ball club? Was there an arranged meeting with friends to discuss an American citizen named Natalee Holloway? Was there activity involving a boat?


Joran van der Sloot - Suspect Statement - 06/14/05


On Monday, May 30th 2005, I did not talk to anyone at school about having left behind Natalee. At approximately 17.00 pm, I was dropped off by my father at the Raquet Club. Between the hours of 17.00 pm and 18.00 pm I was in the gym. I was talking there with "Koen" nickname "Cul". We spoke that it was cowardly/weak and that no one was there. My tennis lesson was between the hours of 18.00 pm and 19.00 pm. According to me I was not called by anyone during that time. I had also made no calls myself. Approximately 19.00 pm, I was ready with playing tennis. I showered in the clubhouse


Art Wood - NATIONAL ENQUIRER - 01/06/06


The dramatic new line of investigation revolves around the timeline of May 30, starting about 18 hours after Natalee vanished. There are several unexplained missing hours during which authorities believe that her body was dumped at sea. Former U.S. Secret Service agent Art Wood, who spent months on the island investigating the case, told The National Enquirer: "Joran told police that he played tennis with a friend during the evening hours. And the pal backed up his alibi. But when I investigated the Racquet Club I found that Joran had never played tennis there that night."



Joran van der Sloot - Joran's Book

PAGE 98

Paul drops Joran off at the RC at 6:15, but none of his friends are there so he doesn't feel like playing tennis. He gives his trainer an excuse and goes to the gym where he meets Koen. They talk a while and then they ask Andre, David, and Joran's tennis buddy "Marco" (Guido) if they want to play poker at the Wyndham. Marco says he has to work until 10:00 in the HI casino. Andre says his dad will join them in the game. Joran calls Paul and asks permission, saying Marco will bring him home after, Paul says OK. Joran takes off his tennis shoes and puts on flip flops. He walks from the RC past the Salinja to the beach, then via the beach he reaches the Wyndham at 6:45 (Note: book doesn't mention looking for his shoes).



Rick Segall/Dave Holloway - America's Most Wanted (AMW) - 04/11/06


Police have told Dave that the night after Natalee's disappearance, a boat was launched from an input just down the beach from the Holiday Inn where Natalee stayed.



15. Joran states in his June 14, 2005 suspect statement that on the evening of May 30, 2005, he did not walk past the Fisherman's Hut on his way to the Wyndham to check if Natalee was "still lying there". Why would Joran entertain the thought that Natalee may be "still lying there" eighteen hours after he left her? The implication is that Joran knew full well that Natalee was deceased.


Joran Van der Sloot - Suspect Statement - June 14, 2005


At approximately 19.15 pm I left on foot for the Wyndham Hotel. I was alone. My tennis gear I had left behind the bar at the Raquet club. I had also removed my tennis shoes and left them in the bag behind. I had taken from my tennis bag a pair of slippers and walked away on those. From the clubhouse I walked in the direction of Salinja to the Marriot Hotel. I walked along the same route that Deepak had taken to drop off me and Natalee. At the beach of the Marriot I tried for a little while to find my shoes. They were nowhere to be found. I looked for about two minutes. Then I walked over the beach to the Wyndham Hotel. On the way there I saw a lot of people. I did not go to Fisherman's Hut to see if Natalee was still lying there.



16. Following Jug and Beth Twitty's arrival on the Island on the evening of May 30, 2005, Charles Croes of Aruba Phones was contacted at 11:30 PM by a "major friend" who required assistance pertaining to cell phone information that related to a missing Natalee Holloway. On June 30, 2005 Charles Croes conveyed to Greta that following a 1:30 AM meeting with the Twittys he drove to the cabana area near the Holiday Inn to check whether Natalee was there. Byran Burrough states in the Vanity Fair article that Charles Croes claims he drove to the California lighthouse. Why would it cross Charles Croes mind that Natalee Holloway could possibly have connections to either of these areas – and why would Mr Croes change the location? Could it be that Charles Croes was conversing with Paulus and Joran at the VDS residence following the initial contact with a "major friend" and prior to the late night meeting with the Twittys?



Charles Croes - On the Record w/Greta - 06/30/05


C. CROES: After that, we spoke a while. And then we left that location with the intention of going to the Holiday Inn to continue meeting. On the way there, a young man and I were sitting in my car. And on the way there, instinctively, I wanted to go to drive off, pull over to the cabana area, just to look to see if perhaps she was there.


Bryan Burrough - Vanity Fair: Nightmare in Paradise - 01/02/06


Croes, meanwhile, drove north up the beach road and, just below the lighthouse, found a group of teenagers drinking cheap wine.


Charles Croes - One Happy Island: Visit Aruba - 06/02/05


There are issues in this case that can go beyond the obvious in their implications.

It will take time for all the information regarding this lovely child to come out. Some of it will be hard to handle and some of it will be expected. With regards to the family of this missing child, my prayers are with you.

I was with them on the first night they arrived to ARuba (looking for their daughter) from midnight until 5:30 AM and have kept in touch. In my opinion, this issue has far reaching implications for all those involved.

I wish all of us strength

charles
arubafastphones.com



These facts beg the question of why Aruban authorities have yet to prosecute these four criminals in this case?


How can four suspects in a kidnapping, rape, and murder investigation go unchallenged when it is apparent they all knew something had happened to Ms Holloway, and were taking steps to hide that fact before they could have logically known she was missing?



Natalee and her family deserve justice, and we will not let up until they have it!

Natalee’s Freebirds

September 14, 2007

COULD IT BE POETIC JUSTICE?





After examining all the legal angles of the Kalpoe/Dr. Phil case I decided get some legal advice from Steven Snider, a criminal defense attorney out of Atlanta, Georgia.


Michelle:

If the Plaintiffs (Kalpoes, et al.) do not come up with the discovery as required, the Defendants (Dr. Phil, et al.) can move to dismiss the case. Most likely the judge will grant the motion and order the case to be dismissed with prejudice. If this happens and the Kalpoes are in default, can Dr. Phil's attorneys file a motion with the Court ordering the Kalpoes pay their (Dr. Phil's) attorney fees? Am I correct?

Steven Snider:

Yes. That is only if Dr. Phil's attorneys wish to pursue that. In order to do so they would have to file a motion with the Court showing this was a frivolous lawsuit, had no merit, and was a waste of the Court's time and taxpayers money. If the Judge agrees to the motion, he/she has the SOLE DISCRETION to order that the Kalpoes PAY Dr. Phil's attorney fees.

Michelle:

Not to mention they could responsible for their OWN attorney fees, right? (Unless someone was paying their bill all along, but I'm rooting for contingency.)

Steven Snider:

It is depends on what has been stipulated by the Court and how the parties wish to handle it. But yes, in the worst case scenario those boys are screwed.

Michelle:

(Jumping with elation...) YES! If the Kalpoes were taken on as clients under contingency that means the Kalpoe attorneys fronted all the money to put this lawsuit in place: the filing fees, man/woman hours putting the case together, money spent on phone calls, faxes, copies, retrieving records, etc. That adds up $$$ and they will want to recoup that...as you know attorneys want their MONEY!



Thanks for your time Steven! Aruban Boycott may ask you to come back again to explain some other procedural issues as they arise.


September 12, 2007

CUTTING THEIR NOSES OFF TO SPITE THEIR UGLY MUGS...



Bottom line: If Deepak et al does not come up with their "discovery" to show CBS, et al, then their suit will most likely be DISSED AND DISMISSED.


How'd ya like that Kalpoes? Did you know that if you lose or dismiss a civil suit with prejudice YOU are responsible for attorney fees? Wonder who is paying your bill?



Judge Gives Dr. Phil,

CBS Access To Holloway Files

(CBS) LOS ANGELES Lawyers for CBS Television and "Dr. Phil" McGraw can have access to e-mails and Aruban documents about two brothers arrested, then released, in the disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway, according to a ruling obtained Wednesday.

Deepak and Satish Kalpoe allege they were defamed in a Sept. 15, 2005, "Dr. Phil" show during which it was alleged that they gave Holloway a date-rape drug and had non-consensual group sex with her. The episode also implied the siblings helped kill Holloway and dispose of her body, according to court papers.


Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Edward A. Ferns issued a 12-page ruling Friday that upheld the tentative ruling he reached in favor of CBS and the celebrity doctor before he took the case under submission Aug. 30.


"The documents are relevant to the most fundamental issues in this case," Ferns stated. "There is no other (information) which can substitute for the documents sought by the defendants due to the nature of this case."


Ferns stated it is not important that the majority of the documents sought by CBS and McGraw attorneys are in the hands of Aruban authorities.

"Most, if not all documents originated in Aruba, simply because that is where Natalee Holloway went missing and where the criminal investigation arose," Ferns stated. "The competing policies of California and Aruba would not be undermined by production (of the documents)."

Attorneys for CBS and McGraw maintain they need the information to refute the Kalpoes' defamation suit filed last Dec. 13. But lawyers for the brothers say much of the information the defense wants is in the hands of Aruban authorities, who they say have refused to release it until the investigation is complete into Holloway's disappearance.

Holloway was vacationing with friends on the Caribbean island resort when the 18-year-old vanished the night of May 30, 2005.

The Kalpoes and another Aruban resident, Joran van der Sloot, were arrested in the girl's disappearance but later released.

The Kalpoes and van der Sloot have maintained that they were not involved in her disappearance. They denied rumors and allegations they had sex with her.

Attorneys for CBS and McGraw claim documents exist showing the Kalpoes admitted to both Aruban authorities and to van der Sloot that they had sex with Holloway.

In a separate declaration to Aruban police, van der Sloot said "that he thought ... Deepak Kalpoe had raped the girl and thereupon murdered her," according to the defense's court papers.

The CBS/McGraw lawyers also want copies of all e-mails between the Kalpoes and other people regarding the case.

Edmund J. Siegert, an attorney for the Kalpoes, said during the Aug. 30 hearing that he is "between the old proverbial rock and a hard place" because his ability to comply with Ferns' order is dependent upon what Aruban authorities decide to give him.

"No one wants to thumb their noses at any of the institutions here," Siegert said. "I'm trying to balance ... and not get anyone in trouble with any tribunal."


But defense attorney Charles L. Babcock said during the same hearing that the lawyers for the Kalpoes were being "duplicitous" in their arguments because Aruban authorities have often discussed the Holloway case in the media.


"When it helps them they will solicit statements from authorities in Aruba about this case," Babcock said.

In another ruling today Ferns has now made final, the judge denied a motion by the CBS/McGraw attorneys to dismiss the estate of private investigator Jamie Skeeters as a defendant in the lawsuit.

The Kalpoes allege that associates of McGraw sent Skeeters to Aruba to develop material for a segment of the show dealing with the Holloway case.

Skeeters, using a family friend and co-worker of Deepak Kalpoe, gained his confidence by saying he could help exonerate both Kalpoes of any wrongdoing in the Holloway case, the suit states.

Skeeters then secretly videotaped and recorded an interview with Deepak, according to the suit. Part of the interview was broadcast during the "Dr. Phil" segment, including statements the suit maintains were "significantly manipulated and altered."

Skeeters died Jan. 24.

In addition to defamation, the Kalpoes' suit alleges invasion of privacy, emotional distress, fraud, deceit and civil conspiracy.

The CBS/McGraw lawyers maintain the Kalpoes are public figures who are obligated to show the defendants knew the statements during the "Dr. Phil" episode were false, or that they acted in reckless disregard for the truth.

A case management conference is set for Nov. 7.

On June 1, another judge dismissed a wrongful death case against the Kalpoes by Holloway's parents, ruling the Los Angeles Superior Court did not have jurisdiction. The parents maintained the brothers conceded jurisdiction when they filed their lawsuit in Los Angeles against CBS and McGraw

http://cbs2.com/local/local_story_255140039.html