TO TELL THE TRUTH OR NOT THE TRUTH?

Arubatruth isn't being truthful... Sounds to me like these folks are trying hard to cover their asses and are scared of the implications the boycott on Aruba will have on their economy.

Here's the scoop...thanks to scaredmonkeys.com

Arubatruth stated on their website:

The tapes of Deepak Kalpoe being questioned by Jamie Skeeters did not provide any new information for investigators. In fact, one tape that was of the interview run on the Dr. Phil show was "manipulated" according to forsenic experts.

Investigators certainly had hoped that the tapes might reveal more about exactly what happened that night on the beach. But this analysis by four independent forensic experts found that the phrase they wanted to hear was just not there.

Even so, Chief Dompig has asked, along with the prosecutor, for a review by the FBI.

Here are my questions to Arubatruth.com:

Where are the statements by these so-called experts claiming the tapes are indeed manipulated? If these were forensic experts, then why would Aruba need the FBI to go over the tapes? By the way, how was Aruba able to get 'forensic information' so quickly if they took their sweet time reviewing all the other evidence? And speaking of forensic evidence, what ever happened to the forearm bone found? Did your forensic experts find anything out about THAT yet?

Another CLAIM by Arubatruth:

It was clear that the family had the same dismay as investigators when the tape review was completed. Beth admitted that it was possible, without her knowledge, that the tape was altered or improperly edited.

My question to Arubatruth:

Where did you guys get this quote? Did you just make it up? This is what Beth really said about those tapes (FOX, November 27, 2005, Big Story Weekend):

"Well, I'm so glad I've had the opportunity to review this tape. I've seen it in it's entirety...the uncut copy. And yes Deepak does specifically say "She did and you'd be surprised how simple it was." I think what we're having trouble with here Rick is a language barrier. It's a semantic problem. The Dutch Forensic Institute has stated that the tape they received from the private investigator and from the fbi has not been manipulated. The one by Dr. Phil was not manipulated, it was edited for television. You can't have a 2 1/2 hour taped interview on a one hour program. We just needed a 30 second soundbite or a ten second soundbite."