NOW ANOTHER STORY JORAN? WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE FOOLING?
Feb. 22, 2006 — In an exclusive interview with ABC News' Chris Cuomo for "Primetime," Joran Van der Sloot, the Dutch teen seen with American Natalee Holloway the night she disappeared from Aruba in May, said he planned to have sex with her when they left a bar together.
My favorite quotes from Joran--these are instant classics:
"We were planning on going to my house, because she said she wanted to go to my house," he said. "My intention was to take her to the house to have sex with her."
But the couple did not end up sleeping together, he said. "I asked her if she wanted to have sex, and she was fine with it," he said. "I didn't have a condom with me though in my wallet, and I won't have sex with a girl without a condom." (A PIMP without a condom? I'm shocked! By the way, this is another story I haven't heard. Which number lie is this? 240?)
"She didn't seem drunk," he said. "She seemed like she drank a lot, but there's a difference between someone being absolutely drunk and someone … actually having had a couple drinks." (You would know Joran...you are a teen alcoholic!)
"In Aruba that was part of my lifestyle … going out, being single and picking up girls," he said. "Going out with them, having a good time and then saying goodbye." (Admitting that he is a sexual predator!)
"I didn't want anyone to know," he said. "I didn't want anyone to know I left her at the beach." (You didn't want anyone to know that you left her dead on the beach...buried in the sand until you could ask Daddy for help.)
When asked why, after all the lying he's done, his word should be credible, he said, "There's absolutely no reason to believe me." "I would probably not believe myself, no," he added.
HE SAID IT HIMSELF! See! I knew he was digging his own grave...
10 comments:
Well, Joran old boy, I guess you're cultivating your ability in the art of character assassination. I mean, some might think it was indecent to talk about the perceived shortcomings of someone last seen in your company ... and that nearly nine months ago ... but nobody would ever accuse you of reticence.
Let's see here ... you said of Natalee that she wasn't drunk, "but she looked like someone who drank a lot." Pardon me, but are you saying she was a regular tippler? She was fat, boorish, obese, out of it, generally hanging loose in the wind, so to speak?
I can think of some people who might qualify for that description (just between us, I've often wondered about your own parents, whose disconnection from reality seems to be permanent), but Natalee was trim and pretty. So I don't know where you get that idea from. Maybe it's just that you don't see too many girls who aren't drunk by the time you've been with them for a while. Can't say that I blame them.
And don't be too upset if I point out that you weren't laying on the beach, you were lying on the beach. At least if your new revised story is to pass muster. Lots of native English speakers have trouble with those words, and your English is better than my Dutch or Papiamento. So I guess we can't expect that you are making a Freudian slip ... of course, since you have also said she was drifting in and out of consciousness, maybe you weren't quite sure. But reality for you is a very flexible soft cushion, isn't it ... an air mattress that you think will support you in any posture.
I am a little puzzled as to why you didn't address lie number one in more detail ... you know, those two security guards. Remember? Early on, you said that you and your sidekicks brought Natalee back to her hotel and they escorted her in. That was quickly disproven ... funny, isn't it, how nobody on the show raised those inconvenient little details. But that was last year's story, last month's, or last week's ... after all, we don't hang on to autumn's fallen leaves, we grow new ones. Shouldn't our alibis be handled the same way?
And I'm glad that your story ended with the words that are absolutely correct ... something like "Right now it's just time to tell the truth."
If only you knew how to do it.
This guy is pathetic... In his current affair article he says she was obviously drunk saying strange stuff... Dompig says he gave statements Natalee was going in and out consconciousness...The security guard locked up with Deepak says.. Deepak said she was very, very drunk.. way too much alcohol. What's his book going to be called "Death by a Thousand Cuts" Michelle notice anything odd about the times on that video or is it just me??? Joran comes in at 19:51.. Natalee at 20:58 but they are sitting at the table together at 20:25...???
Jamie Skeeters probably altered the tape. HA HA
you can tell when Joran lies:
HIS LIPS MOVE.
His BIG RED lips...courtesy of Loreal. The shade is called "red light district".
An observation of an AP article. Notice how AP is now referring to Natalee as the "Alabama woman" and Van Der Sloot as the "Dutch teenager." Natalee has always in the past been referred to as the "missing Alabama teen." Guess Joran is now the victim of Natalee the predator.
Here is the AP story
Dompig said today in the Dutch press that what Joran's been saying is absolutely nothing new. He has no reason or any evidence to question him again. And.. if Beth has any documents showiing that Joran/Natalee had sex, he'd like to see them, because after almost 9 months of investigation, there's NO evidence that they had sex or there was a gang rape. That's all in BHT's head. You gotta love the guy. And, they've had the ABC video from day one.
he tell truth too you see mr dompig does
Dompig knows who saw Joran, Deepak and Koen leave on Koen's boat the night Beth came to Aruba. Dompig is screwed because he is Aruban...arubans are considered second class next to the upper class dutch. He is under their thumb. Dompig knows everything. Ask him about the one he must protect...if he speaks the truth of what he knows it could ruin or end his life.
So Dompig has heard all the lies before and of course they have no evidence...Yes we are aware of that fact...This is the crux of all the problems...Multiple lies...compounded by accomplices lying to support a proven lie.. and of course Sloot continuing his tall tales and now saying satish picked him up and of course the kalpoes lawyer saying he did not pick him up... what does this suggest to you.. is this the way a innocent man conducts himself or do you buy the line that he was scared...an thats not even counting the time line involved here...at least we know why obstructing justice is a crime in the USA...it wastes valuable time tracking false leads and allows guilty parties to destroy evidence...Sloppy police work..sloppy prosecutor...just plain messy...the fact that is clear is the 3 have the answers..we will get them...sooner or later...the fat lady is gonna sing and the game will be over..
Post a Comment