May 12, 2006

MY OPINION: THIS IS NOT AN ARM




Anonymous...I believe this is the picture you are talking about. If you watch a couple seconds before this shot, you will see him holding a white sheet...I believe the "arm" is the white sheet. But who knows??? We are talking about Aruba, here. You can't ever rule out any crazy or wild possibility with those freaks.



25 comments:

Anonymous said...

The next frame you can see him pushing "the arm" down, if it was a sheet, he would be pushing it "out" of the way.

This whole deal stinks!

Aruba can go to hell!

Thanks for posting the picture

Ruddy

Anonymous said...

Just like sharks, Joe T and Joran are pursuing Natalee like the little girl sea surfer being bitten off her arm in the morning hours in the South Florida coast. Joran is the Big White Shark
who draws in the interest of another brown shark like Joe T who has a bad mouth worse than Joran. The American people like to blow them up like like what's int the movie "Jaws". Natalee is never provocative. She is very friendly and trusting and wants to help people. Somehow Natalee was being lied to and led to believe Joran that he was giving her a free ride
back to the hotel in the cab he had just hired. Once the cab sped past the Holiday Inn, Natalee knew she was trapped by those three vicious sex predators, and her struggle to get out just began, and she never had a chance because it was 3 against 1, and she was cruelly drugged, raped and killed by those three pervert sex sharks. Joe T is Joran's big shark daddy,
and he loves the media attention. On May 17, the judge is going to flatten these sharks with her gravel of opions, and the civil case will go forward all the way to the US Supreme Court. This is a landmark case for justice for Natalee who has been held "hostage" by Joran and Aruba. The American people want our government to free Natalee from the bondage and false imprisonment by the lying and vicious Arubans sharks.

Anonymous said...

I am telling you, on May 17 at 2:20pm EST, the whole world is going to pause for a minute to hear the NYC Supreme Court decision on the Natalee's case, is she going to get her justice
or not. Natalee is a honorable American teenager citizen. She has been attacked by a big while Aruban shark sex predator Joran. This landmark case has caught the outrage and passionate imaginations of all the people in the world since the 9/11 terrorists attack in NYC. The blockbuster movie "Jaws", the horror Great White, is being played into people's mind.
The horror Great White Joran has a new trainer Joe T, that makes this "new Jaws movie" or the civil case much more additive to all the viewers. All the people in the world want to watch how this Joran Jaws moive going to spin and twist it, and try to understand all the Joran lies and plots. It will be a big booming economics windfall money making business for NYC because all the world tourists are coming to town to get a first preview in CourtTV of the Killer Great White Shark Joran and his new trainer Joe T. And the whole world will not be disappointed by this Great Civil Trial of the Century.

Anonymous said...

The more you look at Joran's pics, you realize indeed that he has a shark's look and a shark's head. You can see his ugly jaw when he grins. Yeak, I saw his his shark look in his infamous pic in flickr.com . He comes from below and tries to bite off the girl's private. I never knew Joran is doing sharking until I read about this top selling BOYCOTT ARUBA BLOG SITE. This site has become world famous. I noticed many people at Hong Kong Airport were browsing this particular blog while waiting for boarding the international flights to USA.

Anonymous said...

What does the California Lighthouse look like? A huge pimpled penis shooting out of the rocks at Aruba's northern tip, the sand dunes and bushes growing around it are like men's pubic
hair blowing dried by a hot air blower. No wonder Joran is the Lighthouse worshipper since he has small footprint. People laughed at his small penis and that's why he claimed his 14 shoe size. The Hollanders gauge the penis by the size of wooden shoes men wear. It will always help to make a bigger claim in front of young ladies. The puzzles of lies by Joran are
fitting together to profile him as a real sex predator. No doubt about it.

Anonymous said...

Joran is a vicious big white shark sex predator with a little black littlejohn, and Joe T is riding on him. Somewhere Joran got caught with his lost size 14 shoes which the Royal Dutch police officer identified as an evidence of a bigger lie. Joe T has the same issue, his dates of notarizations of his affidavits exhibits are far streched and not credible. Both are deemed to be damn liars, we will see them in court on May 17.

Anonymous said...

Well said boys and girls, let's put these Aruban sharks on the civil trial, and see how good they can dive and hide. I bet Joe T will be eaten by those Aruban sharks in due process as well. Too late for Joe T now, He was feeling so bad that he had hired a wrong client Joran. Joran had lied to him about the underage girl witness. Some boat cleaner had the girl's underwear and it had Joran's DNA sperms on it. The bounty hunters are negotiating with the boat cleaner lady to see if she wants the reward money and turns in that soiled undies for forensic evidence.

Anonymous said...

Now we have identified Joran as the Shark with the Jaws, and Joe T is his willing trainer. There will soon be a break for the Natalee's case in the courtroom. Hopefully the bounty hunters can obtain the DNA tainted underwear from the boat cleaner lady. The forensic DNA evidence will link Joran to that underage girl, and will nail Joran as the serial rapist who claimed he had done the same thing over 20 times. The DNA screen will also detect the presence of rape drugs if they were being used on that girl. The thing is the rape drug chemical signatures were embedded into the fabric once it came out from the girl in urine spurts.

Anonymous said...

All the Republicans and Democrats all agree at the eve of the Mother's day to push the civil case forward. If not, it will make the current white house administration looks really bad since the president has two beautiful daughters of his own, and any of his daughters could have been Natalee. If Bush allows the civil case to be thrown out, he is sending a wrong message to Aruba and the whole world. Any foreign sex pervert can think they can harm our American daughters with paying any consequences with the helps from their own government for the coverup and disposing of the body and any forensic evidences. The Natalee case has risen to the No. 1 Attention and Emotions Drive in this November election of many Republican seats. Henry Hyde of Illions is one example, his anointed successor is being hammered as "uncaring" and "cold face". It's not good for the image of the Republican Party.

Anonymous said...

All the Republicans and Democrats all agree at the eve of the Mother's day to push the civil case forward. If not, it will make the current white house administration looks really bad since the president has two beautiful daughters of his own, and any of his daughters could have been Natalee. If Bush allows the civil case to be thrown out, he is sending a wrong message to Aruba and the whole world. Any foreign sex pervert can think they can harm our American daughters with paying any consequences with the helps from their own government for the coverup and disposing of the body and any forensic evidences. The Natalee case has risen to the No. 1 Attention and Emotions Drive in this November election of many Republican seats. Henry Hyde of Illions is one example, his anointed successor is being hammered as "uncaring" and "cold face". It's not good for the image of the Republican Party.

Anonymous said...

In JoeT's mind, he is now running scared. All the public polls are going against him up to this moment on the Mother's day. JoeT and Joran together are branded as "Sharks" which are not good for their reputations. The NYC judge won't even want to probe them with a 10 feet long bamboo pole. They had been painted as a pair of "unclean hands" in JoeT's own arguments for the civil case. Everything has been so wrong with JoeT's court filings, according to the research done by the summer intern law students. Five out of five contest mock trials, JoeT was completely shut up by the Judge's burning queries about his civil case laws background, and he is overstepping his criminal defense experties, and why is JoeT treating his clent Joran like a convicted criminal but throwing out defamations suits against the freedom of public opinions. If Joran is innocent, let him speak in court for himself. So the civil case go forward and accepted by the New York Supreme Court. JoeT is going to file a counter suit and an appeal to the US Supreme Court by Friday.

Anonymous said...

Aruba is an island of sharks, just who wants to go there got eaten up. No Body, No Crime, that is what the Arubans keeping saying Joran is innocent. Even JoeT now has suspected himself picking up a wrong client like Joran on Pro Bono. He smells something really bad around him, may be a big rotten rat Joran. The 10.5 goes 14 shoe size lie is really bothering JoeT, how are you going to defend a pair of evil shoes, like Carlo said, that is entirely Joran's own business. That shoe thing is the one fuse going to blow all his lies and stories wide open in the civil court. Only thing JoeT can do is to get Joran to turn on Paulus, his bad old daddy as the real sex predator and murderer. People think that's what Joran and JoeT are comtemplating in their evil minds right now, to sell out good old daddy, let Paulus be the fall guy. Joran can easily testify against Paulus. And Joran was a minor who had the no-fault insurance issued by the Aruban Judge Rik Smid. Joran could just be enough leeway to get away with it. People do think Paulus is the real killer. Joran is just a runner pimp boy for his day. Paulus had picked out Natalee for himself that night at the Excelsior casino.

Anonymous said...

The judge told JoeT that Joran never wanted to talk to the LE community, so let him speak in our court. And Joran is very fluent in English speaking, and there is not of any Forum Inconvenice that can prevent him from coming into the United States. If Joran willing, our government's cargo planes can offer him a ride, and our LE systems can offer him a place to stay. On this Mother's day, I am one of the American mothers wanting to hear the truth from Joran under oath. It is only fair and balanced to any parties that involved in Natalee's disappearance. Joran is the last one seen with Natalee alive by his own admission. And he is the only qualified candidate to speak to the court. And we don't her Natalee here to speak for herself. The complaint of Natalee's parents against Joran under our Constitution is legitimate. And no one is above the law. And no libel seems to exist at this point of proceeding, and every citizen is entitled to his/her own opinion. All the hearsay will resolve in this court. It is my concern that if we don't hear Joran in our court to clear his suspicions, we will always have a doubt in our heart about his innocence. So let Joran speak, that is the order from this court.

Anonymous said...

The summer intern law students did a poll at NYC Central Park on Mother's day this morning, all the mothers are in favor of the civil lawsuit go forward. They want to hear how a foreigner Joran can speak so well about his true story in court. They don't think the American people should let Joran get away with his ABC interview. He defineitely needs to prove innocence in court. They don't quite agree with JoeT's assertion that Joran is innocent beyond reasonable doubt. They said there are some guest rooms in the city hall, Joran can stay there during the trial. Plus the new China Air Cargo Co. are willing to offer Joran free flights on their cargo planes between Amsterdam and New York City.

Anonymous said...

When you put Joran under oath, he will break, simply because he will be really scared and he will not be able to remember all the lies and stories he had ever told. Ask him about all the "keywords" that he uttered, like the "sharks", "lighthouse", "condom", "size 14 shoe", "sands in shoes", "they control us", "20 times." All these words had meanings varying from story to story.

Anonymous said...

Internationally, outside Aruba, the whole world, especially people in England, Australia, China, Japan and Singapore, they can see here you have three strong mean men agaist a defenseless tender young woman. And the woman disappeared in less than two hours without a trace followed immediately by all the ever changing lies. If Natalee doesn't get her justice in her own country, the whole world will laugh at United States as not protecting their own women. And Joran will rape and murder the American tourist girls again. In Hong Kong, a Scotland girl met her similar fate like Natalee few years ago after she was befriended by a white Bermuda man and two dark Eastern Islanders. Within 48 hours, the Hong Kong police tracked down the three rapists murders. They located the body in an old hillside tunnel dug by the Japanese during the WW2. The white Bermuda man was seen last with the woman by some fishermen at the pier during that fatal night.

Anonymous said...

The summer intern law students are contiuing digging up bones from Joe Tacopina's court filings. Many interns were surprised by the sloppy legal works done by Joe on this simple and easy civil case. You don't really need 119 pages in this case because Joran is not yet condemned as a rapist murderer by the judge. Instead a 50 pages of "resume" type pleading will do alot of good for Joran. Joe's filing should have included letter of recommendations from the International School of Aruba, the offer letter of scholarship from the South Florida University, his soccer scores in the international tournaments, if he can include Joran's GPA, that will be the very best defense to show Joran is really a good boy. The judge want to see that good things about Joran, not his Forum Non Convenience.

Anonymous said...

The opening statement after the declaration of "AFFIRMATION OF EMERGENCY" in one of Joe Tacopina's court filings is worded as the following: 1. I am the attorney of record for the Defendants herein and, as such, am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of the within action. The above opening statement is poorly conceived, very confusing to the Judge, and badly defeating for the Defendants. The term "record" is a bad word to be applied. The Defendants do not yet have any criminal records. The terms "as such" implies partly representing, which is contrary to "fully familiar with" verbose. The verbose "within action" should have been just once clear word "emergency. A more powerful opening statement should be somewhere like this: 1. I am the attorney of recognition for the
Defendants, herein am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of the emergency.

Anonymous said...

124 In accordance with that line of reasoning, courts have held that an American citizen’s “home forum” includes any court of the United States. Natalee is an American citizen. Joran is an alien. The court favors home forum for American citizen victims raped and murdered in other countries because it is a national moral issue and also the foreign law enforcements are often biased against the American tourists, especially happening in certain regions of South America, which includes Aruba.

Anonymous said...

JoeT said "None of the hundreds of necessary witnesses whose testimony will have probative value are residents of New York." But the Supreme Court ruled that 41 The weight of the burden on the
defendant is determined by the amount of deference the plaintiff’s choice of forum deserves.42 Where a U.S. resident plaintiff sues in the home forum, the court assumes that the plaintiff chose the forum for the sake of convenience, and as such, the “defendant must satisfy a heavy burden of proof." 109 In terms of the standard for allocating deference to a plaintiff’s choice of forum, the courts focused on the underlying principles of convenience as opposed to strict adherence to the narrow definitions of resident plaintiffs or home forums. 114 The district court committed error when it gave U.S. resident plaintiffs’ choice of forum less deference because they did not reside in the district where they brought suit.115 In weighing this factor against the plaintiffs, the district court failed to consider the plaintiffs’ U.S. residence in their favor.

Sue said...

Joe is not defending a civil case listen to him he is trying to defend a criminal case

Anonymous said...

The annotation next to the title of JoeT's last filing looks laughable. It reads Index No. 102254/06 (BRK) AFFIDAVIT OF JOSEPH YACOPINA IN REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION AND IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS DISMISSAL. The phrase "IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS DISMISSAL" is faulty in construct. The Judge could have read the phrase as "IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF DISMISSAL OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS", by which JoeT had asked his theory of FORUM NON CONVENIENS to be thrown out of court. By the way, what is that code (BRK) following the Index No.? What does it mean? The Judge wont like that, you are defacing the Index No. and the court filing protocol. This is a serious ignorance committed by JoeT in filing. He is totally unqualified in handling this landmark civil case.

Anonymous said...

Indeed Joe T is defending his criminal case by saying "And, notably, any finding that Aruba's "security would be prejudiced" by interference with an ongoing investigation would likely result in the denial of "Letters of Request," pursuant to Article 12 of the Hague Convention. Presentation Three: Latin America and Blocking Statutes. Presenter: Henry Saint-Dahl, Esq., Special Counsel, Jones
Walker, author of Dahl’s Spanish-English Dictionary, admitted to practice in Madrid, Buenos Aires, New York and Texas. This presentation will showcase an analysis of Latin American blocking statutes enacted to prevent forum non conveniens dismissals. These blocking statutes are presented as a natural consequence of the illegal effects that forum non conveniens causes in Latin American systems. The author takes the position that such statutes clarify the law but are not strictly necessary since, even in their absence, lawsuits filed in pursuit of a forum non conveniens order are incapable of generating jurisdiction in Latin America.

dennisintn said...

lol, how is jvds' soccer scores or gpa going to show anything but athletic prowess and the ability to have done better than he has done in the past? i sincerely hope the judge rules to accept the case in n.y. since jvds himself in person told greta that he was looking forward to the trial in n.y. and it wouldn't be a problem for him to be there.
dennisintn

Anonymous said...

Correct. The ISA headmaster refused to verify Joran's GPA without the request by Joran himself and his signiture. What JoeT got was likely a fake which was purportedly made to appear as a recommendation letter from ISA. It was originally included as an Exhibit in the filing, but was finally pulled out in that last minute due to the questionable content and signiaure. And there was no notarization of the signature. There were questions arising about the exact arrival time at school and the score and the type of exam Joran was taking. That was the last day of the school, and no exams were scheduled on that day on the school calender list in the school May 2005 newsletter. One thing is really suspicious about is the newsletters were taken off the web site along with the pictures. People at ISA were refusing inquiries about Joran's last day at school.