August 15, 2007


*Another great job from "Natalee's Freebirds"...we love you guys!



In consideration of Dutch law and how Aruba chose to apply it, why were further serious suspicions gleaned from polis statements ignored? It seemed the more suspicious the circumstances surrounding this case became, and the multiple times these suspects changed their stories - the less aggressive Aruban law enforcement became in attempting to discover the truth about what happened to the victim, Natalee Holloway.

1. Aruban attorneys Arlene Ellis-Schipper and Noraina Pietersz who both have/had connections to the the Natalee Holloway case educate via the American media regarding the criteria for arrests under Dutch law - STRONG/SERIOUS suspicion.


NANCY GRACE - 07-20-2005

ELLIS-SCHIPPER: There is no grand jury in Aruba. It`s a different system. You are arrested based on suspicion, on strong suspicion.


Associated Press - June 9, 2005

Under Aruban law, only serious suspicion from investigators — not solid evidence — is needed for a judge to rule that suspects can be held, Pietersz said.

2. When Dutch law is taken into consideration it can be assumed that the suspicions warranting the arrests of the suspects in the Natalee Holloway case could be defined as STRONG/SERIOUS.


FOX NEWS - 06-24-05

Joran van der Sloot (search) and his friends Deepak and Satish Kalpoe are being held under suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

A fourth man, party boat DJ Steve Croes, is being held under the same conditions.

The fifth man, Paul van der Sloot (search) — the father of 17-year-old Joran — was being held on suspicion of complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping Under the Aruban system, complicity is a lesser charge.,2933,160654,00.html


CNN - 08-26-05

After being detained and then released last month in Natalee Holloway's disappearance, two brothers were arrested again Friday in Aruba on suspicion they acted "together with other people" in rapping and killing the Alabama teen, the prosecutor's office said. Without elaborating on the evidence, the office said in a statement that "new facts and circumstances" led them to re-arrest Satish Kalpoe, 18 and brother Deepak, 21.

"They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately raping somebody," the statement said. "Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on."


ABC NEWS - 04-24-06

Geoffrey van Cromvoirt, 19, has been released into the custody of his parents after spending more than a week in an Aruba jail on suspicion of "criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway.


FOX NEWS - 05-22-06

Guido Wever, an Aruba national, is expected to face charges Tuesday in a Dutch courtroom connection with the disappearance of the high school senior. Wever's lawyer, Gerard Spong was expected to file a suit Monday to prevent his extradition to the Caribbean island on charges of "assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen.,2933,196363,00.html


At Large w/ Geraldo Rivera - 08-27-05

BENVINDA DE SOUZA - ATTORNEY : ... The official charges on Freddy Zedan-Arambatzis are intentionally distribute and show sexual images of a minor; intercourse with someone he knows is unconscious and sexual acts with a girl younger than 16 years.


The basis for the January, 2007 Superior Court's ruling which denied Paulus van der Sloot compensation on behalf of his family and himself for his three day detainment in regards to his connection to the disappearance of Natalee Holloway was justified. The prosecutor had in her possession evidence of SERIOUS AND STRONG SUSPICIONS.


“With attention to the lying declarations that the son of Paulus, Joran Andreas Petrus van der Sloot (hereafter Joran) gave about his last contact on the 30th of May 2005 with the disappeared Natalee Holloway, the suspicion is not unreasonable that he made himself guilty of a conduct that can be qualified as murder, manslaughter, or kidnapping that resulted in death.

The possible involvement of Paulus with that could then be deducted from the file with the official reports of witnesses, amongst which two people suggested a contact existed between Paulus and Natalee Holloway the night of her disappearance, and a tapped report (that was given by the Prosecutor in her final note 1 to the Court). The tapped information and his declaration that he picked up Joran and Natalee by the McDonalds Palm Beach and brought them to the Holiday Inn, are clearly understood by the Dept. of Justice, and could in the judgement of this Superior Court, be considered as an indication of the involvement of Paulus in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.”

The obvious questions remain:

  • Why did Aruban law enforcement and the prosecutor fail to properly follow up on these suspicions?
  • Why did they softball interrogations that appear to be scripted?
  • Why did they not follow up on the glaring discrepancies between the suspects' stories?
  • Why did any of the judges ruling in this case release these suspects?


Anonymous said...

The misinformation of the Aruban attorneys Arlene Ellis-Schipper and Noraina Pietersz on the wayward arrests of the J2K in the Natalee Holloway case had exposed the mental illness of the Aruban dirty police, prosecutors and judges.

Anonymous said...

There had been rampant evidence of serious and suspicions of the coverup of Natalee Holloway's rape and murder by the Oduber government. Geraldo Rivera interviewed the government attorney Benvinda de Souza who denied that Freddy Zedan-Arambatzis had sexual images of some government officials having sexual intercourse with boys and girls younger than 16 years in the red brick government guest mansion.

Anonymous said...

The Dutch insurance holding Eureko disputed with the Aruban Superior Court on the amount of money being covered by the court's wrongful imprisionment policy. Based on Hague/Warsaw no-fault court insurance guildeline, the standard amount of compensation will barely cover the court cost and the judge's salary. Hence, Paulus van der Sloot's reward money was deferred and later suspended. The Aruban courts are all in for the money, not one bit Florine for the justice.

Anonymous said...

The Gang of Five : JORAN - DEEPAK - SATISH - STEVE - PAULUS beat and surpass the Dutch law's strong suspicion mantra with the aid of Network Fox's beach story written by blogger Greta who is a distant Dutch decendent.

Anonymous said...

Why did any of the judges ruling in this case release these suspects? The answer is that all these judges have conflict of interest with the van der Sloot family. One judge always sleep overnight at the Sloot house. The other judge is rumored to have an affair with the woman in the household.

Anonymous said...

There are no grand jury and no mention of conflict of interest in the Dutch judicial system. These two major flaws make a complete Aruban coverup possible.

Anonymous said...

URGENT: The Dutch Netherlnads Kingdom are currently experiencing slow economy and short money supply, affecting the security and defense of the country. The Queen has asked her ministers to find out why is Aruba stopping all the drug money traffic. And how could Oduber have such power in doing so to disrupt the peace between the Kingdom and the Antillies. The Queen thinks the Venesuelan dictator Hugo Chavez is behind this revolt. It is a very serious mistake committed by the Arubans against the Queen. The Queen has been thinking to suspend the Aruban judges' rulings and send the J2K to prison, and to mend fences with the American people.

Anonymous said...

Oduber really thinks he and his government will survive the boycott with the drug money on hand, and the protection provided by Chavez. He doesn't need the tourism.

Anonymous said...

Chavez told Oduber to stand up against the Queen. He asked Oduber to go ahead to take over Curacco and Bonnaire to form the new Republic of Aruba. Chavez already got his Russian submarines. He will sink the Dutch Navy if the Queen invades Aruba. The United States will not intervene.

Anonymous said...

The Queen exposed her weakness by condoning this Aruban murder and coverup for well over two years. She failed in governing Oduber's government. The Dutch Navy were also severely damaged by the cocaine addictions and drunken sailors. Don't think the Queen can defend herself and her Kingdom without the help from the United States.

Anonymous said...

The Arubanboycott has suspenses which arouse the feelings and craving for the truth.

Anonymous said...

Why did they not follow up on the glaring discrepancies between the suspects' stories? This answer came from a bartender in Shark Beach Hotspot. Several legal experts said that by redefining the meaning of ”Something bad happened". The Aruban Dutch law narrowed the principle of the communication "No Body, No Case" covered by Paulus van der Sloot who was a judge-in-training. The legal background of communication focal point gave the Aruban government indirectly the power to blame the victim by using the FBI files with the Aruban Superior court's approval outside the United States.

Anonymous said...

Why did Aruban law enforcement and the prosecutor fail to properly follow up on these suspicions? The United Nations blogger said the following: (A) After a lengthy, time-consuming and complex process the Uniform Code of Criminal Procedure for the Netherlands Antilles entered into force on 1 October 1997. The introduction of this Code has greatly improved the legal position of suspects, for example in relation to the powers of the police during the investigation of criminal offences. These powers include arrest and detention, searches of homes and other premises, searches of body and clothing and seizure of objects. Under the new Code a variety of conditions must be satisfied before the police are permitted to exercise these "coercive" powers. These include the following general conditions: The exercise of the power should not be unreasonable taking into account the interests at stake; The authority to exercise the power may not be used for a purpose other than that for which it was conferred;
The power may be exercised only if the goal cannot be achieved by other less radical means;
The infringement of rights caused by the exercise of the power must be consistent with the gravity of the offence. (B) A suspect has the right to remain silent and is not obliged to answer any questions asked by the police. Prior to any interrogation by law enforcement officers regarding a suspect's involvement in a punishable act, the person concerned must be advised that he or she has the right to remain silent. The officers or magistrate conducting the interview must at all times refrain from acts designed to extract a confession by the suspect that is not given of his or her free will (article 50 Code of Criminal Procedure).

Anonymous said...

Why did they softball interrogations that appear to be scripted? The former ALE Chief Dompig leaked the recent court briefings: The Dutch Queen Beatrix this month heard oral arguments on the question of whether to destroy all ALE police interrogation videotapes of Joran, as petitioned by his custodial father and lawyer. For many reasons, the Aruban government said such an arrest was insensible, uncivilized, and unnecessary. Next month, the new Aruban district attorney moved to vacate the suspisions of three men, Joran, Deepak and Satish who were found lying about the disappearance of the Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway in Aruba on May 30, 2005. Sometime in June 2005, the boys had confessed on the camera. There was not a shred of other evidence, but the taped confessions were textured with vivid details and persuasive. One boy showed how he pulled off the Alabama teenage girl's pants. Another expressed remorse for his first rape.