April 24, 2006

A PICTURE CAN TELL A THOUSAND WORDS




All I have to say is those people in Aruba sure do like to take pictures of themselves...these pictures are going to ruin them in the end. And we ALL have copies of EVERYTHING. Be afraid...be very afraid.


What do you think of this picture??? Pretty good composite sketch, huh?


It has been alleged that his name is Jerry Strawberry, or Raphel, and there's another one out there...so many names! He is supposed a best friend of Steve Croes.






18 comments:

Anonymous said...

he does look like the composite!
Very interesting.

Anonymous said...

looks just like that guy...

blackhawk said...

I heard he is a Mentally challenged person[[retarded?]] and is 24 years old. From what i heard they like to get him pumped up and he does some kind of dances and basically makes a fool out of himself and they get a good laugh out of it..nice guys huh...The person in the composite whom the victim describe was supposedly in his forties....but it does kinda favor him doesn't it...

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
http://joranvandersloot.blogspot.com/ says the following, "Courtroom Showdown. John Q. Kelly, who just returned from Aruba, spoke to Greta about the latest in the civil suit case. Kelly is expected to file their opposition of the dismissal filed by Joe Tacopina within 30 days. Tacopina will then respond to that in 10 days paving way for the courtroom showdown set
for May 17th 2006."
http://www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/nyc/supreme/index.shtm also says the following, "
(f) Preliminary Conference.
(1) In all actions or proceedings to which this section of the rules is applicable, a preliminary conference shall be ordered by the court to be held within 45 days after the action has been assigned. Such order shall set the time and date for the conference and shall specify the papers that shall be exchanged between the parties. These papers must be exchanged no later than 10 days prior to the preliminary conference, unless the court directs otherwise. These papers shall include:"

Obviously, Joe Tacopina either is late or has forgot to file his reply to John Q. Kelly's rebuttal on 4/11/06. And now the civil suit proceding is in default to uphold the jurisdiction on Joran and Paulus van der Sloot. Natalee has the victory! The civil suit will move forward by the rules of the court.

Mon Apr 24, 11:19:49 AM EDT

We still don't have Joe Tacopina's reply to John Kelly's last and most recent rebuttal to his desire for the dismisal of the civil case against Joran. It's now 4 days past the due day. Joe T. is a loser and a big mouth, the lawsuit is going to stay and nail him and Joran permanently. If it comes to default judgement, Joran will be the biggest loser, he will never be legally to enter the US controlled territories without getting arrest for his non-compliance. It's more like a live prison for Joran on the face of this earth for the rest of his life.

Anonymous said...

The New York Supreme Court says the rules are the following:

Section 202.01 Application of Part; Waiver; Additional Rules; Application of CPLR; Definitions.

(a) Application. This Part shall be applicable to civil actions and proceedings in the Supreme Court and the County Court.

(b) Waiver. For good cause shown, and in the interests of justice, the court in an action or proceeding may waive compliance with any of the rules in this Part, other than sections 202.2 and 202.3, unless prohibited from doing so by statute or by a rule of the Chief Judge.

(c) Additional rules. Local court rules, not inconsistent with law or with these rules, shall comply with Part 9 of the Rules of the Chief Judge (22 NYCRR Part 9).

(d) Application of CPLR. The provisions of this Part shall be construed consistent with the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR), and matters not covered by these provisions shall be governed by the CPLR.


(e) The granting or continuation of a special preference shall be conditional upon full compliance by the party who has requested any such preference with the foregoing order or transcript. When a note of issue and certificate of readiness are filed pursuant to section 202.21 of this Part, in an action to which this section is applicable, the filing party, in addition to complying with all other applicable rules of the court, shall file with the note of issue and certificate of readiness an affirmation or affidavit, with proof of service on all parties who have appeared, showing specific compliance with the preliminary conference order or transcript.

(f) In the discretion of the court, failure by a party to comply with the order or transcript resulting from the preliminary conference, or with the so- ordered stipulation provided for in subdivision (b) of this section, or the making of unnecessary or frivolous motions by a party, shall result in the imposition upon such party of costs or such other sanctions as are authorized by law.

(g) A party may move to advance the date of a preliminary conference upon a showing of special circumstances.

(h) Motions in actions to which this section is applicable made after the preliminary conference has been scheduled, may be denied unless there is shown good cause why such relief is warranted before the preliminary conference is held.

People wonder if Joe Tacopina can come up with a showing of special circumstances in his overdued late filing. If not, this is a very serious matter, it is equivalent or equal to the contempt of the court in the awareness of the endangerment of his non-American client Joran.

Anonymous said...

Another thing is that Joe Tacopina has listed the civil case under his criminal case categories in his website. This is an offence in bad taste to the New York Supreme Court. Joe T. has made too many missteps or mistakes to harm his client Joran already. Joran must fire Joe to save himself from the destruction as soon as possible. Joran must hire Jeff Fieger of Michigan to salvage this civil case right now, before it becomes too late. See, the default judgement is not an option, since Joran so far is regarded is the only spokesman of Aruba on this civil case, the jury can award a contitutional judgement to freeze and seize the whole assets of Aruba based on an old precedent civil case occured in the early part of the American legal histories. Beware! The danger is immiment! Joran must fire Joe Tacopina now. You can check out the facts about the early American Historical Cases on the Internet.

Anonymous said...

(f) In the discretion of the court, failure by a party to comply with the order or transcript resulting from the preliminary conference, or with the so- ordered stipulation provided for in subdivision (b) of this section, or the making of unnecessary or frivolous motions by a party, shall result in the imposition upon such party of costs or such other sanctions as are authorized by law.

The clause of "the making of unnecessary or frivolous motions by a party" reflects what Joe Tacopina have been doing in past 2-3 weeks. Threatening to sue all the Americans with the rightful right of the freedom of speech under the protection of the US Constitution.

Anonymous said...

The civil lawsuit case is active and urgent as of "TWITTY, ELIZABETH ANN v. VAN DER SLOOT, JORAN , SUPREME COURT, NEW YORK COUNTY, Index Number: 102254/2006. On 2:15PM, March 8, 2006, The SAID
DEFENSE PARTY MOVED THIS COURT, in IAS MOTION 12, seeking the following relief: EXTEND TIME.
This motion is currently pending before the court and is assigned to Judge KAPNICK, BARBARA. On
May 17, 2006, an appearance is scheduled on this motion ISA MOTION 12 before Judge KAPNICK,
BARBARA. At this appearance on 17 May 2006, the defendents have to prove to the court that they
have sufficient cause to dismiss the case. If they do not, the case will proceed. People don't think Joe Tacopina has anything else to say but threatening to sue everybody. Case prevails and
proceed. Justice for Natalee.

Anonymous said...

wow, that does really look like the guy.

Anonymous said...

Greta and Producer,
I watched the interview with Joran van der Sloot's attorney with interest.
I am an attorney who has specialized in high profile and celebrity defamation lawsuits for the last 12 years. Until my recent move from Los Angeles to Las Vegas, I worked with (and was trained by) my father who was the lawyer for Carol Burnett in her landmark case against the National Enquirer. Over the years, the media has consulted with me about many high profile cases. In fact, a couple of years ago, when Gary Condit sued the National Enquirer, I appeared on MSNBC's "The Abrams Report."
Joran's lawyer's threat of a slander suit was interesting. One particular point of interest is that if such a suit is filed in the United States, Joran will have the burden of proving that the allegations he claims are defamatory (rapist, murderer, etc.) are false. If this potential lawsuit is something that you would be interested in exploring further on your show, I would be happy to appear as a guest.
Please feel free to contact me at this e-mail address or by phone.
Thank you,
Mitchell Langberg

Anonymous said...

In order to reverse the declared PRO BONO status, Joe Tacopina and Joran need to do the following:

(c) Retainer Agreements

(1) A signed copy of the attorney's retainer agreement with the client shall accompany the statement of net worth filed with the court, and the court shall examine the agreement to assure that it conforms to Appellate Division attorney conduct and disciplinary rules. Where substitution of counsel occurs after the filing with the court of the net worth statement, a signed copy of the attorney's retainer agreement shall be filed with the court within 10 days of its execution.

In other words, Joe Tacopina has to go before the court clerk in his own presence to file an attachment to today's filing to correct the payment issue. Else Joe Tacopina has to affirm his PRO BONO before the judge and be declared beyond reproach.

Anonymous said...

This is also a close resemblence. Wonder what Tracy Allen would say?

http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=unHCwjBxPtR1J6VJ

this site calls him allen raphael

Anonymous said...

Jerry Strawberry aka Cheremy Croes
http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=zvRiNP4kRLWtp7Yh

Anonymous said...

The guy they mentioned in the Tracy Allen case if even true was said to be in his 40s, this guy is 24. Also when Tracy appeared on the Big Story in March she said she gave the license plate number of the guy who flashed her and a description. Now how hard would it be to find that guy if it even happened. Or is this another blue eyed dutch boy story. GVC didn't even have blue eyes.

Anonymous said...

dave and his brothers saw the sketch and was driving around aruba and they thought they saw the guy and they got his tag number and gave it to the police. well that was that. they are so horrible. i love this web site
teresa

Anonymous said...

Just another false trail to get people to wander down! Stay on J2K!
Need to look no further, except in Anita's bed! I like tunnel vision....helps me focus!

Anonymous said...

I'm thinking back to the day Greta & Beth had the talk with Paulus & Anita at their home. When he was sweating like the pig he is. After all this time I still feel that he was more worried about what may be said about him in Anita's presence. She does hold the whip in that family. The whole bunch needs to be hooked up to a lie detector and believe me, this mess would be over and Natalee would be at home getting a proper funeral. I am so sick of Joe T and J R!!!!!!
Chris

Anonymous said...

Look's like there will be alot more bodies found of young boys burned up with legs cut off if they dont get what they want which is for this case to fall away. That will never happen and they seem to handel it alot differant in Aruba covering this caseup how many will they kill to keep them for comeing forard?