June 21, 2007


*New post from The Freebirds!


Police statements given by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe purporting the Holiday Inn drop off lie was created in haste after receiving a phone call from Paulus van der Sloot in the early morning hours of May 31st, while on their way to the van der Sloot home. Yet movements of these suspects on May 30th, as well as communications records and statements from Aruban officials regarding these events that were taking place on May 30, 2005 imply that the cover-up had begun prior to Beth and Jug Twitty's setting foot on Aruban soil.


The following words of Freddy Zedan in his June 12, 2005 witness statement would imply that the Holiday Inn fabrication was collaborated on May 30, 2005 - many hours prior to Jug and Beth Twitty's arrival at the van der Sloot's residence on the morning of May 31, 2005.

(a) On Monday afternoon on the 30th, Joran came to my house. He told me that the previous day, Sunday, he had befriended a girl in the Holiday Inn casino and that she had invited him to come to Carlos and Charlies that evening.

...They drove to the Lighthouse, she wanted to see sharks. But Deepak only drove up to the Lighthouse because his car is very low to the ground and cannot drive up to the North side of Aruba. The girl had said to Joran that if Deepak and Satish would have lived in her town, they would be slaves. After that they drove to the hotel. When the girl had pushed open the door of the car, she fell to the ground. Joran wanted to help her but she shoved him away.

(b) The next day, Tuesday May 31st 2005 in the afternoon, I was with Joran at the raquet club.


Paulus Van der Sloot claims in his witness statement of June 18, 2005 that he went to bed after picking up his son at the McDonalds at 11:00 PM on the evening of May 29, 2005 and slept through the night. Paulus denies Beth Twitty's claim that he stated on the early morning of May 31, 2005 that he picked up Joran and Natalee at McDonalds at 4:30 AM on May 30, 2005. However, according to Greta Van Susteren, Paulus concedes to a Dutch TV correspondent that he may have used his phone throughout the night. Also, the Superior Court judgment in January, 2007 which denied compensation for wrongful detainment ruled that the Department of Justice acknowledges that Paulus own declaration states that he picked up Natalee and Joran. The court stated that this could be considered just cause for detainment in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.


According to Jan van Straten, a missing person's report was filed with the Aruban Law Enforcement by the beach patrol on behalf of the chaperone, Paul Lily on the morning of May 30, 2005. It could be assumed that this report would have included a description of the people who Natalee Holloway was last seen with as well as a description of the vehicle. It could be concluded that those within the ALE who had a personal and/or working connection to Paulus van der Sloot would have clued in regarding the identities of those described in the report. Is it possible that the van der Sloots were forewarned in regards to what info Natalee's friends had reported - information that could implicate Joran in the happenings of that fateful morning of May 30, 2005


Deepak Kalpoe conveys in his June 11, 2005 suspect statement that after dropping Joran and Natalee off at the beach on the morning of May 30, 2005 he and Satish returned home. He states that after Satish goes to bed he chatted on the internet with a friend named John Charles Croes. In his June 29, 2005 suspect statement Deepak convey that the purpose of his chatting "was to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday." It can be assumed that Deepak Kalpoe’s attempt to create an alibi on the morning of May 30, 2005 prior to Natalee Holloway being reported missing would imply that Deepak knew that "something bad" had happened.


On June 30, 2005 Karin Jansen was being interviewed on the "Abrams Report" when she claimed that on May 30, 2005 Paulus van der Sloot assured Joran, Deepak and Satish that without a body there is no case. However, her words changed on subsequent days. Could Karin Janssen be part of the cover-up?

(a) “He confirmed to me that he told them that a few days after she disappeared." July 1, 2005 - FOX NEWS

(b) "He also spoke about the case with his son and the two other suspects some days after Holloway's disappearance." July 5, 2005 - CNN


Prior to Jug and Beth Twitty's arrival on the Island, certain happenings of May 30, 2005 would imply that someone within the ALE was assisting Joran, Deepak and Satish in getting their stories straight regarding their encounter with Natalee Holloway.

Joran van der Sloot

On July 12, 2005 Anita Van der Sloot stated in a Joe Scarborough interview that Joran was picked up from school by police on Monday, May 30, 2005.

Deepak Kalpoe

Deepak Kalpoe claims in his official statement of June 10, 2005 that he vacuumed his vehicle prior to picking up Joran Van der Sloot on Sunday May 29, 2005. He remembers telling interrogators at Bubali that his vehicle was very clean because he had vacuumed his car the prior evening. This would imply Deepak was questioned by police at Bubali station on May 30, 2005.

Satish Kalpoe

On June 29, 2005 in a secretly recorded conversation in a police van, Satish Kalpoe tells Joran he told police about the choller in his first police statement. Satish's witness statement of May 31, 2005 has been revealed and there is no mention of the choller. It can be assumed that the first statement must have been taken on May 30, 2005.


Art Wood's investigation revealed that Joran Van der Sloot lied in his June 14, 2005 suspect statement in regards to his tennis lesson on May 30, 2005 at 7:00 PM. Art revealed, "when I investigated the Racquet Club I found that Joran had never played tennis there that night." Inquiring minds want to know what Joran was doing at the Racquet Ball Club following his father dropping him off at 5:00 PM on May 30, 2005. According to revealed court testimony - sixteen hours prior Carlos Ramos, the gardener, had observed Joran and Deepak sitting in Deepak's vehicle near the Racquet Ball Club. It is even more curious when it is considered that Joran's June 14, 2005 suspect statement reveals that he was again dropped off at 5:00 PM at the Club by his father on the evening of May 31, 2005 to play a game of tennis which he concedes he never played.


Joran van der Sloot declares the following in his suspect statement of June 14, 2005 that after his tennis lesson at 7:15 PM on the evening of May 30, 2005:

"I walked over the beach to the Wyndham Hotel. On the way there I saw a lot of people. I did not go to Fisherman's Hut to see if Natalee was still lying there,"

Why would Joran entertain the thought that Natalee would be at the exact same place he had left her seventeen hours earlier?


While detained at the same time, Mickey John claimed that Deepak conveyed to him that Paulus van der Sloot was a participant in the fabrication of the Holiday Inn story. As this account was related to Natalee Holloway's mother and stepfather on the morning of May 31, 2005, the implication of Paulus' involvement is that the collaboration must have taken place on May 30, 2005.


In his June 11, 2005 suspect statement Deepak Kalpoe declares that after leaving his place of employment on the evening of May 30, 2005, he joined Joran at the Radisson casino at 12 o'clock midnight. He states in his declaration that two hours later Joran and him left the Radisson and were in the process of parking at the Wyndham when Paulus called to inform Joran that Natalee's mother and stepfather were at the home. Deepak then declares in his June 13, 2005 suspect statement that following Paulus call, he and Joran went directly to the van der Sloot's residence - arriving there at 2:40 AM.

Inquiring minds want to know how Deepak's time line is possible when it is taken into consideration that Beth and Jug did not arrive at the van der Sloot's residence until approximately 3:30 AM on the morning of May 31, 2005. According to Jug Twitty, he and Beth were still at the Holiday Inn at 3:00 AM viewing video footage. It was at that time that one of the employee's from Universal Air who were assisting them came rushing into the Holiday Inn to inform them that Deepak's vehicle had been observed within the gate at the van der Sloot's compound. The Twittys were driven to the police station and after waiting in the parking lot for a period of time, they were driven to the van der Sloot's residence.

These facts clearly show that the four main suspects not only had involvement in the crimes committed against Natalee Holloway, but also their intentions to cover up their crimes. That none of these criminals have yet been prosecuted is appalling and disturbing.

Natalee and her family deserve justice, and we will not let up until they have it!

Natalee’s Freebirds



Anonymous said...

Since Oduber took power from Day 1 and corrupted the whole Dutch Antilles, there is no end in sight.

Anonymous said...

The lying about leaving Natalee at the beach is biggest mistake Joran ever made because there is no witness coming forward to defend him and give him the alibi, not even the Dutch can validate the beach story but Greta. Tonight Greta still says the beach story is real. Go figured.

Anonymous said...

The AVP sharply critized Oduber MEP party for letting the Queen visiting C&C. Some extremists in his government would go extraordinary to kidnap the Queen and dump her onto the beach just to prove Joran is innocent. The KLPD was informed by the FBI to escort the Queen out of the danger.

Anonymous said...

Joran is no longer useful for Aruba and Netherlands. His lifecycle has been spent. To end the stalemate, Joran must be ended in someway. They are arranging for him to enter a mental hospital in Hague and continuing to write his another new book. Figure that he will just wither, dries up and got vanished. The NFI plan to run his body through the MMR to recover some brain images and help to find Natalee eventually.

Anonymous said...

The most damning aspect of the HI lie is that it converted what was obviously on its face a kidnapping case into a missing person's case - all on the strength of statements by the three natural
first suspects in any kidnapping inquiry. And, how
this was done exposes the elementary school
coloring book paint-by-the-numbers nature of the
Dutch legal system where the ability of multiple suspects to match stories overrides basic concepts of law enforcement that Americans take for granted.
Common sense says that the HI lie came into play when it was first needed and that was when the known circumstances of Natalee's disappearance were first reported. The tight Alice In Wonderland fit between the lie and the legal system suggests official involvement and coaching. More troubling
is the apparent follow-on coordination between
Paulus, v. d. Stratten, Jacobs and even the
prosecutor from the following: (1) refusal by Jacobs to take Beth's statement the first day - per Beth (2) v. d.
Stratten's efforts to interfere with the initial search efforts - per Julia Renfro in Vanity Fair (3) no
surveillance of suspects for 48 hours - per Dompig in his last TV interview (4) refusal of
police to question suspects the first night after
police car ride with Paulus - Vanity Fair
(5) eventual arrest of security guards by prosecutor. Interesting that even in last p. r.
salvo from Aruba Julia Renfro is right back with
the same rhetoric about Beth's rush to judgment
about kidnapping. I think that the "lady" (sic)
doth protest too much.

Anonymous said...

Dutch is a dying language. Hardly anyone in college will pick Dutch as the 2nd foreign language electives. English and French are the most popular for the Harry Porter fantacy. Joran's lies make the Dutch language look the most vile and corrupt, no one want to take a chance wasting their money on learning an useless language.

Anonymous said...

A whole lot more scrutiny needs to be given to the
J.C. Croes / Deepak correspondence. Is J.C. Croes
actually a potential alibi witness for Deepak? Does
ALE have printouts of the actual correspondence
through computer records or are just relying on
verbal accounts provided by Croes and Deepak? If
they don't, why not? Further, what connection, if any,
does to groping claim, have to the framing of the
last-known-whereabouts stories by the suspects?
I have trouble getting past the fact that the groping claim contradicts both the Hi story and the Joran /
Natalee beach story, but corroborates Joran's
second story about being dropped off first. I also
have trouble with the fact that the groping story combined with any evidence that Joran and Natalee actually exchaged e-mails (easily
manufactured) would seem to effectively preclude a judge from finding Joran guilty of anything under the Dutch system. Hard for me to believe that this is all coincidence given Paulus's
knowledge of the legal system, including the
evidentiary standards applied to judges under that system.

Brown Sugar said...

Natalee didn't bring a pen and paper to C&C...and I'm sure Joran didn't either. (Remember he forgot his condoms?) The email exchange story is a LIE.